search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Swisher et al.—Achatella Delo, 1935


Diagnosis.—Eye extending from L3 to S2 or anterior tip of L2; located away from glabella anteriorly, with fixigena traversed by short palpebral ridge (e.g., Fig. 8.4, 8.11). Conspicuous glabellar tubercles on each side of anterior glabellar embayment. Lateral cephalic margin curved outward behind intersection with posterior branch of facial suture. Pygidium with pointed posterior margin.


Holotype.—A cephalon (UC 20685; Fig. 8.5–8.7) from the Kimmswick Limestone near Batchtown, Calhoun County, Illinois.


Other material.—Paratypes: three cephala (UC 33780a, 33780c, 33780e), a hypostome (UC 28975a) and two pygidia (UC 33780b, UC 28977 [latter specimen assigned questionably to the species]); additional sclerites from Missouri: three cephala (OU 222760, OU 222761, OU 222763,), a cranidium (OU 222762), a librigena (OU 222764), and three pygidia (OU 222766, OU 222767, OU 222768); sclerites from Oklahoma: three cephala (OU 12121, 12123, OU 222765), a cranidium (OU 12124) and a pygidium (OU 12125)


Description.—Cephalon semielliptical in outline, excluding genal spines.Cranidial outline subtriangular to subtrapezoidial, narrowing toward a gently rounded anterior margin. Cranidial length approximately 48%of maximumcranidial width. Axial furrows are shallow grooves, with conspicuous apodemal pit at intersection with S3.Glabellamoderately convex, expands evenly forward from minimum width at S1 to maximum width across the anterior lobe; maximum glabellar width approximately 45% of maximum


cranidial width. Median embayment of anterior glabellar margin flanked by conspicuous tubercles. SO nearly transverse, deepest abaxially and curved slightly forward, but shallows medially. S1 also transverse, expands adaxially becoming weakly bifurcate with very shallow, short (exsag.) branch in some specimens (e.g., Fig. 8.7). S2 strongly incised, proceeds obliquely forward fromaxial furrow; width (tr.) equal to 27%of glabellarwidth at L3. S3 shallower than S2; extends obliquely backward from prominent apodemal pit at axial furrow; terminates adaxially at second shallower pit. LO curved gently backward, increasing in length (exsag.) toward midline; maximumlength approximately 17.5%of glabella length; dorsal surface slopes upward and backward, becoming raised above the rest of the glabella. L1 approximately transverse, expands forward weakly near axial furrow. L2 with straight posterior and oblique anterior margins; expands adaxially. L3 subtriangular in outline with adaxially convergent margins so that length (exsag.) becomes reduced by approximately 50% away fromaxial furrow. Anterior lobe suboval in outline. Anterior border very short, separated from glabella by shallow preglabellar furrow; narrows abaxially and eventually cut out entirely by suture. Palpebral lobe forms narrow (exsag.), steeply inclined, tapering band (Fig. 8.10); eye short (exsag.), extending from L3 to S2 or anterior tip of L2; located away from glabella anteriorly, with steeply inclined palpebral area of fixigena traversed anteriorly by short palpebral ridge. Palpebral furrow well defined, finely etched groove. Anterior branch of the facial suture runs approximately parallel to margin of glabella before curving inward sharply along the anterior margin of the anterior lobe. Preoccular fixigena is narrow (tr.), tapers anteriorly. Posterior branch of the facial


75


suture curves gently backward toward genal spine. Posterolateral projection of fixigena is wide (tr.) with strong posterior border furrow that gently curves toward genal spine, fading beyond intersection with shallow lateral border furrow. Lateral cephalic margin curved outward behind intersection with posterior branch of facial suture. Genal spine relatively long, slightly greater than 50% of cephalon length. Sculpture of rounded tubercles developed moderately across glabella and fixigena. Conspicuous median tubercle on posterior margin of LO. Lateral librigenal border widest (tr.) opposite librigenal


slope between the librigena field and lateral border. Librigena field strongly convex; suboccular furrow well defined. Eye raised above level of glabellar crest; strongly curved and subconical; basal width in lateral view equal to approximately 85% of height. Visual surface with 20 columns of domical lenses, with up to nine lenses per column. Pygidium relatively narrow, long and triangular in outline,


field, but becomes greatly reduced anteriorly along sutural margin. Border furrowweak and expressed largely by change in


with maximum width approximately 90% of pygidial length. Lateral and posterior profiles strongly convex. Axial furrows well defined, shallow toward posterior. Axis moderately convex and tapers backwards toward a bluntly pointed posterior tip; width approximately 39% of pygidial width across the anteriormost ring; includes 12 well-defined axial rings and short (sag.) terminal piece that comprises at least two segments. Axial ring furrows strongly impressed anteriorly, becoming more faintly impressed posteriorly; deepest abaxially, shallowing and becoming slightly longer (sag.) medially. Pleural field strongly convex with steeply sloping lateral margin. Faint interpleural furrows oblique, becoming curved backward distally, and defining up to 12 pairs of pleurae. Pleural furrows deep and oblique; define subequal anterior and posterior bands. Slight dorsal flexure present along pygidial axis, readily apparent in lateral view (e.g., Fig. 12.2), raising posterior tip. External surface generally smooth and lacking large tubercles. Doublure strongly concave in dorsal view and lacks terrace ridges; extends to level of abaxial termination of pleural and interpleural furrows.


Remarks.—The short (exsag.), tall eye (e.g., Fig. 8.8–8.11) separates A. katharina from all other members of the genus apart from A. achates; these species were compared in detail under the discussion of the latter. One of Bradley’s paratype pygidia (Fig. 11.1–11.3) is relatively shorter than all other pygidia (e.g., Fig. 11.4–11.9) and is assigned only questionably to the species.


Acknowledgments


This research was supported by NSF grant EAR 0819715. D.M. Rudkin and P. Fenton at the Royal Ontario Museum, B. Hunda and J. MacKnight at the Cincinnati Museum,M. Coyne at the Geological Survey of Canada, and P. Meyer at the Field Museum arranged loans of type material. T.N. Barker, D.K.Moss, and A. Thomas assisted in fieldwork in Missouri; R. Burkhalter provided invaluable help in the lab and in fieldwork in Oklahoma and Missouri; C.E. Brett guided us to the Blue Licks locality in northern Kentucky. Alan Owen and an anonymous reviewer provided useful comments that improved the paper.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188