search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
74


Journal of Paleontology 90(1):59–77


surfaces of cephalon and pygidium with finely granulose sculpture, augmented by tubercles on glabella.


Lectotype.—According to Nitecki and Golden (1970), a crani- dium (UC 965; Fig. 6.9, 6.10) in the Field Museum was ori- ginally part of the collection of U.P. James, and was figured by Meek (1873, pl. 14, fig. 2a) in his description of Dalmanites carleyi. We select it as the lectotype. It is most likely from the Fairmount Member of the Fairview Formation (Foerste, 1919) of the Cincinnati region.


Other material.—Five cephala (CM 51280a, CM 51280b, CM 51280c, CM 31699a, CM 31699b), and two pygidia (CM 51280d, CM 31699c).


Description.—Cephalon is relatively wide, semielliptical out- line (excluding genal spines); cranidium approximately sub- trapezoidal in outline. Cranidial length approximately 47% of the cranidial width across the posterolateral fixigena. Axial furrow generally shallowly impressed; the furrow tends to weaken in front of L3. Well-defined apodemal pit at intersection of S3 and axial furrow. Glabella outline pinches inward from the LO to the narrowest point across L1, slowly expands from L2, then more rapidly across L3 and the anterior lobe. The anterior tip of LO and the posterior tip of L2 are approximately parallel. Maximum width of the glabella across the anterior lobe is approximately 48% of cranidial width; glabella has low convexity, relatively flat adaxially. LO relatively wide and long; generally subovate in outline but posterior margin nearly transverse medially; expands outward beyond level of L1. LO occupies approximately 19% of total glabellar length. L1 rela- tively transverse, elongate subrectangular in outline. L2 angled slightly posteriorly, middle portion of the lobe is slightly expanded, but outline is otherwise subrectangular. L3 is larger, subtriangular in outline, narrows sharply toward the axis. Anterior lobe is relatively long and narrow, only slightly extending past L3; subovate in outline, rounded anteriorly especially along the lateral margins. SO narrow, shallowly impressed along the axis, then marked by deeper lateral furrows angled very slightly anteriorly. S1 furrow moderately impressed, transverse laterally, curves gently anteriorly adaxially. S2 furrow directed obliquely backward, more strongly developed adaxially, terminating short of lateral glabellar margin. S3 extends oblique forward; becomes more strongly impressed abaxially toward the apodemal pit. Palpebral lobe narrow, arcuate band that tapers abaxially; palpebral furrow is finely etched groove. Eye extends from S3 to S1; does not reach axial furrow anteriorly. Anterior branch of the facial suture curves inward to follow anterolateral margin of the anterior glabellar lobe. Posterior branch of facial suture poorly preserved but apparently nearly transverse. Genal spine moderately long, less than half of total librigenal length and slightly less than glabella length. Coarsely granulose sculpture covers entire cranidial surface, with tubercles on central part of glabella and anterior lobe; on well-preserved specimens, weak median embayment on anterior glabellar margin flanked by indistinct, larger tubercles. Librigenal lateral border and border furrow well defined; furrow expressed as a relatively wide, trough-like break in


slope. Librigenal field moderately convex; subocular furrow gently impressed. Visual surface of eye weakly conical in lateral view, with width approximately three-fourths of height. Twenty-two columns of lenses with up to eight lenses. Strongly developed granular sculpture across the librigena. Pygidium elongate, triangular to subtriangular in


outline, length approximately 90% of width. Axis of 11 to 12 well-defined rings and furrows outlined by distinct axial furrows. Pleural field relatively flat adaxially, but with strong change in slope distally toward weak lateral border defined only by absence of furrows. Up to 12 pairs of oblique, firmly impressed pleural furrows; interpleural furrows obsolete. Granulose sculpture developed along the axis.


Remarks.—In their revision of Achatella, Ludvigsen and Chatterton (1982) noted the limited information available for A. carleyi (Meek, 1872), although they speculated that it might be a junior synonym of A. achates. In addition to the lectotype, we had access to archival specimens from the type area (Figs. 6, 7). They are mostly compacted to varying degrees but demonstrate clearly that A. carleyi is a distinct species in the C1 and C2 deposition sequences in southern Ohio and northern Kentucky. Lespérance and Weissenberger (1998, p. 313) interpreted Foerste’s (1919, pl. 19, fig. 17) image of A. carleyi as showing a small occipital spine. There is no trace of a spine in any of our cephala, although there is an occipital tubercle (e.g., Fig. 6.2), which could perhaps be exaggerated by compaction in Foreste’s specimen. Meek (1872, 1873) does not mention either feature in his description. The pygidium that Meek (1873, pl. 14, fig. 2d) attributed to the species has a rounded posterior margin that resembles those illustrated in this paper (Fig. 7.3, 7.5). Achatella carleyi was compared to A. achates earlier, under


the discussion of the latter. It shares an outwardly curved lateral cephalic margin behind the posterior branch of the suture with A. katharina from Missouri and Oklahoma. However, it differs from A. katharina in having a much larger palpebral lobe (compare Fig. 6 and Fig. 8.8–8.11), a shorter (tr.) S2 glabellar furrow that terminates well short of the lateral glabellar margin (compare Fig. 6.1, 6.6, and 6.10 with Fig. 10), and a background sculpture of coarser granules; the posteriormargin of the pygidium is rounded (Fig. 7.3, 7.5) rather than sharply pointed (Fig. 12.4). Achatella consobrina (Tripp, 1954, pl. 4, figs. 26–33) has a


similarly sized eye to A. carleyi, but is closer to the glabella. The lateral margin of the cephalon appears to be evenly curved, rather than curved outward behind the posterior suture. The S2 furrow is better defined and extends to the lateral glabellar margin, and the sculpture of the glabellar surface includes numerous, more closely spaced fine tubercles. Other species, including A. kuckersianus (Schmidt), A. clivosa Lespérance and Weissenberger, and A. retardarta (Reed) have eyes that extend forward to reach the axial furrow.


Achatella katharina (Bradley, 1930) Figures 8–12


1930 Dalmanites katharina Bradley, p. 286, pl. 30, figs. 19–28. 1940 Dalmanites katharina; Delo, p. 112, pl. 13, figs. 26–29.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188