120
Journal of Paleontology 90(1):102–132
such that the exterior–facing part of each metacarpal will be called anterior, and the interior–facing part (the palmar surface) will be called posterior. Metacarpal I is elongate (length/midshaft breadth =9.0;
Table 2) with a straight medial border and curved lateral border (Fig. 16). The proximal end is D-shaped, with subequal anteroposterior and transverse dimensions, unlike the transver- sely compressed proximal end of metacarpal I in Venenosaurus (Fig. 17). The midshaft is rounded in cross section and bears a flat boss about two-thirds of the way up the shaft on its posterior side, as in the metacarpals of many sauropods (e.g., Camarasaurus, Ostrom and McIntosh, 1966; Veneno- saurus, Fig. 17). Distally, metacarpal I is subrectangular, undivided, and its articular face is orthogonal to the long axis of the bone. The posterior side of the distal end is weakly divided into medial and lateral condyles. Metacarpal II does not appear to be as gracile as metacarpal I (Table 2). Its proximal end forms an elongate triangle, whereas its distal end is
subrectangular with two posteriorly projecting condyles (Fig. 16). As in other sauropods, the medial condyle (i.e., that facing metacarpal I) is better developed. The proximal and distal ends are subequal in area to those of metacarpal I. Little is preserved of metacarpal III; its proximal end is teardrop-shaped with a flat anterior face and pointed posterior face. Metacarpal IV is strongly damaged proximally. It tapers towards a narrow midshaft, and widens distally. As in the other metacarpals, the distal end has weakly divided condyles posteriorly, but is undivided distally (Fig. 16).
Ilium.—The left ilium is preserved as several fragments (ASDM 500-30, -371, -372, -373, -379; (Fig. 18) that do not fit together with complete precision. The preacetabular process flares laterally and is strongly expanded anterodorsally. All that is preserved of the right ilium is a 34 cm–long segment of the pubic peduncle, whose distal end measures an estimated 21cm transversely (ca. 18cm preserved) by 10cm anteroposteriorly. Though the medial face is not completely preserved, it is clear that Sonorasaurus possessed the titanosauriform condition, in which the iliac peduncle is anteroposteriorly narrow and trans- versely broad (D’Emic, 2012). Considering the left and right ilia together indicates that the pubic peduncle was very tall, resem- bling that of Giraffatitan (Janensch, 1961:pl. 198; Fig. 18). None of the many broken surfaces of the ilium reveal pneumaticity.
Tibia.—The right tibia is poorly preserved and is missing much of its proximal and distal ends (Fig. 19). It measures at least 95.5cm long, and its midshaft is D-shaped and measures 13.8cm × 8.0 cm, with a circumference of 34.8 cm. Its distal end is expanded transversely relative to its midshaft, but this may be an artefact of crushing of the latter. Little else can be said about its morphology due to damage.
Figure 18. Holotypic ilia of Sonorasaurus thompsoni (ASDM 500) from the mid-Cretaceous Turney Ranch Formation of Arizona, USA: (1) partial left ilium in lateral view; (2) pubic peduncle of right ilium in lateral view; (3) same in anterior view; (4) same in posterior view; (5) same in distal view.
Figure 19. Holotypic right tibia of Sonorasaurus thompsoni (ASDM 500) from the mid-Cretaceous Turney Ranch Formation of Arizona, USA: (1) lateral; (2) medial; (3) anterior views, with schematic cross section depicted between (2) and (3).
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188