NEWS ANALYSIS
WITH THE FUTURE of computer technology hinging on ultra-fast data transfer between and within microchips, all eyes are on silicon photonics as an option to keep traffic moving. One company keen to cash in on this rapidly growing field is US-based manufacturer of etched facet lasers, BinOptics. Using its so-called Etched Facet Technology, the company has fabricated and recently incorporated InP based lasers and other photonics components for use in silicon photonics applications.
“We’ve seen the level of interest in silicon photonics rise very dramatically over the last twelve months,” says chief executive Alex Behfar. “This is an exciting time for silicon photonics and I think we will see some applications – people have talked about the use of silicon photonics in active optical cables – in the coming year.”
Mechanical cleaving of semiconductor epiwafers is the usual way to define reflective mirrors or facets at the ends of edge-emitting diode lasers. However, this process can be imprecise and incompatible with monolithic integration. With this in mind, Behfar started developing an alternative method while at Cornell University in the late 1980s, and has since commercially developed his process, known as etched-facet technology (EFT).
Based on photolithography and chemically assisted ion-beam etching to form facets, the process has since been used to mass manufacture millions of edge emitters and surface-emitting lasers, known as horizontal cavity surface emitting lasers, HCSELs, as well as integrated photonic devices for Ethernet and Gigabit Passive Optical Networks.
And having bagged a healthy $13.3 million in new investment in late 2011 to fund development in new markets, the company is ready to fabricate edge facet InP lasers for hybrid silicon photonic circuits. According to Behfar, his company can use EFT to fabricate edge emitters or HCSELs, depending on the silicon photonics platform to be used. But why turn to an edge facet laser?
A clear advantage of BinOptics’ lasers is that edge facet technology enables the etching of angled facets that allow light to emerge at an angle or perpendicular to the surface of the InP chip, aiding coupling to grating couplers on silicon
EFT can be used to etch fiducial marks to the laser and silicon photonics chip, aiding low-cost passive alignment
photonic chips. But why not use a VCSEL then?
As Behfar highlights, his InP lasers typically emit at 1270 nm, 1290 nm, 1310 nm and 1330 nm, as well as across the optical C-Band, 1525 nm to 1565 nm. VCSELs are usually based on GaAs wafers and emit from 650 nm to 980 nm with the fabrication of long-wavelength InP VCSELs having barely left the research lab. What’s more, silicon photonics applications demand power levels that are difficult to achieve with VCSELs. And as the chief executive is quick to highlight, while facet cleaving and subsequent coating operations can cause device failures, EFT followed by the company’s proprietary passivation technology circumvents this problem and also eliminates the need for hermetic packages.
“EFT laser chips have successfully passed 5000 hours reliability in 85°C and 85 percent relative humidity,” he says. “You can just put these chips down and they operate in a non-hermetic environment, unlike photonic devices that need expensive TO-can or butterfly-type packages.”
But crucially, EFT enables manufacturers to use low-cost passive alignment, rather than more expensive active alignment, when coupling either a edge facet- fabricated edge emitter to a silicon photonics waveguide or a HCSEL to a grating coupler on the silicon photonics
chip. As Behfar highlights, EFT-formed fiducial marks or cross-hairs, applied to the EFT laser chip and silicon photonics chip, can be used to position one with respect to the other to an accuracy of ±0.1 µm. In contrast, mechanical cleaving has limited the the accuracy of passive alignment to around ±2µm in high throughput manufacturing. As a result many manufacturers – worried that this level of accuracy is insufficient for high performance communications – have turned to active alignment, using precision instruments.
The accuracies may be greater, but as Behfar asserts: “Active alignment involves powering the laser as well as a relatively long alignment time to optimise the coupling to a waveguide. This makes the process generally expensive, and at least one order of magnitude higher in cost, than passive alignment. The economics of active alignment just don’t work.”
“With EFT, you still get the precision and optical coupling you need without having to resort to active alignment,” he adds.
And with his sights set on near-term silicon photonics applications, Behfar also hopes his lasers will be snapped up for the chip-to-chip and on-chip applications of tomorrow. “These applications are still a few years away but they are extraordinarily exciting, and we hope to contribute to that with our technology,” he says.
October 2013
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 17
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142