Trans RINA, Vol 155, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan -Jun 2013


 Annex 4: Design Development - This describes the procedures to be adopted to complete the final phase the exercise, design development.


These documents are structured to guide the students independently through the design exercise. However, the detailed descriptions and guidance of the design steps risked obscuring the overall design process. Therefore, Road Map documents detailing the broad process and key expected deliverables were developed, examples are shown in Figure 4.


As module attendees may not be familiar with naval ship standards and conventions, three


short guidance


documents were produced to provide deeper guidance in particular areas where the existing expertise/knowledge may be limited. These documents were:


 Stability guidance;  Structural design guidance;  Layout guidance.


Outline requirements Annex 2 Section 2.1, 2.2 Staff Target


Concept Sizing


Spreadsheet Annex 2 Section 3.2


Initial Sizing Baseline & Options


Conduct a minor parametric survey


Apply constraints Defining the Staff Target


Conduct a major parametric survey


For example, UCL expects MSc students to develop their own tool for assessing and managing weight and space demands within their design. Their tools are typically developed over several weeks with extensive interaction


A data book with selected information on key payload and ship systems was also provided to support exercise.


the 5.5 MODULE TOOLS


Both the UCL BEng and MSc courses make use of commercial naval architecture analysis software together with other UCL and student


constrained timescale of contact time combined with the challenges of distance learning led to an early recognition that unfeasible.


developed tools. The the normal UCL practice would be


Cost


Baseline + Options Annex 2 Section 3


Capability


Baseline + Options Annex2 Section5


Select preferred solution


Cost Capability Study


Cost / Capability Study


Annex 2 Section 5 Rebalance Ship


Apply constraints


Statement of capability


Annex2Section1.5 Indicative Blockdecklayout Annex 2 Section 1.5,4 Select most Cost Effective Option (a) Key C17 Concept Design Steps Figure 4: Example Road Maps


(b) Key C17 Parametric Survey Steps


Indicative Upper deck layout Annex 2 Section 1.5,4


Complete Form A and sendtoUCL


Indicative Design Annex 2 Section 1.5


Yes


Did rebalancing change ship?


No


C-38


©2013: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98