Trans RINA, Vol 155, Part C1, Intl J Marine Design, Jan -Jun 2013
Control room design on board is closely related to efficient and environmentally friendly operation, maintenance and voyage planning and performance. New technology and better teamwork supports planning ship voyages increased safety efficiency.
for of navigation and improved energy
Future work will include further development and on-board testing of OSMOS: an information sharing system consisting of a database containing relevant information and a ship/voyage
overview. The objectives include
increased and coordinated communication within and outside the ship. This is expected to lead to several overarching aims, such as a better work environment, a positive impact on fuel efficiency and fewer resources used. Society as a whole will enjoy the benefits of safer and more effective shipping.
8. 1.
2. 3. 4. 5. REFERENCES
ALLEN, P. (2009). Perceptions of technology at sea amongst British seafaring officers. Ergonomics, 52(10), 1206-1214. doi: 10.1080/00140130902971924
BLOOR, M., THOMAS, M., & LANE, T. (2000). Health Risks in the Global Shipping Industry: An Overview. Health, Risk & Society, 2(3).
Daft, RICHARD L., & LENGEL, ROBERT H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
EK, Å. (2006). Safety culture in sea and aviation transport. Unpublished Doctoral thesis. Lund University. Lund.
GRABOWSKI, M. (1989). Decision Aiding Technology and Integrated Bridge Design. Paper presented at the SNAME Spring meeting/STAR Symposium, April 12-15, New Orleans, Louisiana.
6.
HÉNIQUE, E, LINDEGAARD, S, & HUNT, B. (2009). Design of Large and Complex Display Systems. In T Ivergård & B Hunt (Eds.), Handbook of Control Room Design and Ergonomics (pp. 83-131). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
7. 8.
HINDS, PAMELA J., & BAILEY, DIANE E. (2003). Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615-632.
HUGHES, T. H. . (2000). The Use of English as a Standard Marine Language in Ship to Ship and Ship to Shore Communications. . Paper presented at the The Second International Conference on Maritime Terminology, Turku, Finland.
9.
JENTSCH, F, BARNETT, J, BOWERS, C.A, & SALAS, E. (1999). Who Is Flying This Plane Anyway? What Mishaps Tell Us about Crew Member Role Assignment and Air Crew Situation Awareness. Human Factors, 41(1), 1-14.
15. 14. 12. 11. 10.
KNUDSEN, F. (2009). Paperwork at the service of safety? Workers’ reluctance against written procedures exemplified by the concept of ‘seamanship’ Safety Science, 47(2009), 295-303.
KOESTER, T. (2007). Psycho-physiological Measurements of Mental Activity, Stress Reactions and Situation Awareness in the Maritime Full Mission Simulator In M Cook, J.M. Noyes & Y Masakowski (Eds.), Decision Making in Complex Environments (pp. 311-320). Aldershot: Ashgate.
LUNDH, M. (2010). A Life on the Ocean Wave: Exploring the interaction between the crew and their adaption to the development of the work situation on board Swedish merchant ships. (Doctoral thesis), Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
13.
LÜTZHÖFT, M. (2004). "The technology is great when it works": Maritime Technology and Human Integration on the Ship's Bridge. (Ph.D. thesis), Linköping University, Linköping. Available at:
http://www.diva-portal.org.
LÜTZHÖFT, M., Ljung, M., & Nodin, K. (2008). Funktionsbaserad bemanning. En förstudie (Function Based Manning - A Pilot Based Study). Gothenburg: Lighthouse, Chalmers University of Technology Report no 09:109.
PETERSEN, E.S. (2010). User Centered Design Methods must also be User Centered: A Single Voice from the Field. A Study of User Centered Design in Practice. (Licenciate thesis), Chalmers Technical University, Gothenburg.
16.
SAMPSON, H, & ZHAO, M. (2003). Multilingual crews: communication and the operation of ships. World Englishes, 22(1), 31-43.
17. WAGNER, E. , LUNDH, M., & GRUNDEVIK, P. (2008). Engine Control Rooms - Human Factors Fieldstudies. Göteborg: MSI Design, Chalmers University of Technology, SSPA Sweden.
18. WATTS-PEROTTI, J, & WOODS, D. D. (1999). How Experienced Users Avoid Getting Lost in Large Display Networks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 11(4), 269-299.
19. WOODS, D. D. (1995). Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computermedium: Ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In J. Flach, P. Hancock, J. Caird & K. Vicente (Eds.), An ecological approach to human machine systems I: A global perspective (pp. 157- 188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
C-14
©2013: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98