This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
cartridge would make a good candidate to try out the X-Dies on. Immediately upon arrival I opened the box and began a cursory exam of the dies, attempting to come to grips on how they worked. On the surface there didn't seem to be any major distinction between the two styles of dies, but when I disassembled the X-Die resizer I found a couple of slight, but very important, dimensional differences in the mandrels. If you look closely at the photo (page 111) showing the disassembled die you will notice that the mandrel, or expander shaft, of the X-Die resizer was redesigned in a kind of stair-step manner. I believe this is a major key in how these particular dies are able to slow down the progress of case length growth. A PERSONAL CONFESSION


I would be the fi rst to admit that I


might have a few personal fl aws within my makeup. It is unlikely that anyone would question that statement, but if they did, I’m quite sure that my wife would be more than willing to set the record straight for them. I suppose one of the worst of these is the fact that I am basically a very impatient person and with that comes a desire to jump right into a project without reading or follow- ing any type of instructions. Avoiding what I often see as the trivialities of di- rections usually allows me to get a jump on the endeavor at hand. While doing so I might have to take a couple of stabs at it before I get everything just right, but to me that is considerably better than trying to decipher instructions over the telephone. I just can't seem to take notes rapidly enough and still decipher them later. There have been a couple of occa- sions, however, that avoiding reading the instructions that came with a par- ticular product has resulted in causing me problems and, yep, you guessed it – this was one of those times. Being eager to see how the X-Dies worked, I cavalierly shoved aside the directions that came in the box and immediately placed the resizer in my press and ad- justed it as I normally do. After resizing the cases, as usual I trimmed each to 0.010" under the recommended maxi- mum length. But as I would eventually fi nd out, that put me on a path that I would eventually regret. Even though I did see some marginal degree of reduc- tion in the length growth, it did not live up to my expectations, or those claims


by the company. After only fi ve fi rings the cases loaded using the X-Dies were already beginning to exceed the specs. Even though that was considerably bet- ter than the results I was achieving from the standard set of RCBS dies, it still was a bit disappointing. Following that sorry beginning


I decided to fall back and start over fresh. After carefully reading through the directions, a fresh set of cases was picked out and trimmed to specifi ca- tions that the directions called for: 0.020" under maximum. After that I carefully adjusted the dies as per the company’s recommendations and from that point forward I experienced considerably better results. So, please, if you do decide to give the X-Dies a try, “Do as I say – not how I originally did.” Read and follow the instructions beforehand. I was quite happy to fi nd that unlike many of the instructions encountered today, these were written in a precise manner that were clear to understand and lacked that typical second language fl are about them. Undoubtedly, quali- fi ed and knowledgeable folks with an understanding of handloading wrote these right here in the great U.S.A. THE TESTING


In order to evaluate the perfor-


mance of the X-Dies I fi gured it would be appropriate to draw a direct compari- son between the performance of those


dies with that of a set of the traditionally styled RCBS dies. Fortunately, I already had a set of older RCBS full-length dies that I’d been using for years. I began the process by selecting four once-fi red cases from a box of Federal factory- loaded ammunition. My intent was to load two cases with each set of dies, fi re those, then repeat that process until the cases had either reached the maximum recommended length, or they had exceeded what I believed was the life expectancy of the cases. After each fi r- ing the case length was measured before and after resizing, and those values were recorded in order to precisely monitor the rate of growth. Both my Hornady and Nosler reloading manuals listed the maximum length of a .22-250 case


The cartridge cases were measured after each fi ring and after each resizing in order to provide a thorough record of the changes that occurred to the length of the cases and to ensure that none exceeded the maximum recommended length.


www.varminthunter.org Page 109


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212