This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Tom Sietsema Dining


it is just an issue of personal taste or mistaken ordering? He says you can send it back whenever you want; they ask you how the food is, and you are paying, so you should be honest. This has been bugging me since a


meal at a two-Michelin-star restaurant in Spain last summer that was so disappointing I am still bitter about it. We ordered a tasting menu, and course after course barely warranted more than one bite. The restaurant is known for avant-garde food, but its “fossilized salsify root and caviar” was totally foul. It was actually amusing to watch people around the restaurant look puzzled by the food, and even disgusted, but then eat it anyway, maybe because when it is that expensive, you feel obligated. But when we finally confessed to the waiter that we weren’t enjoying our meal, they sent us new food off the menu that was way better. So looking back, this makes me


Plugged ears W


and pinched noses Diners’ dismay about music and food


hile I’m away, eating for a story, please enjoy the following edited excerpts from questions and comments that have appeared in some of my recent online food discussions.


Live music in restaurants: I was having dinner, and there was a live duet playing. It’s kind of unusual for music to be played there, but I guessed there was some sort of special occasion. The guy sitting at the table next to mine was annoyed and told the waiter to have them quit playing, and they did. Everyone else seemed to enjoy the music. What do you think? Tom Sietsema: You don’t specify what instruments were being played, or the volume. I love classical guitar, for instance, but might not want an organ recital with my dinner. (Believe it or not, I was once a waiter in a Minnesota steakhouse that had an organ player come in on weekends.)


On returning food: Please help me settle a debate with my husband. When is it acceptable to send back food because you think it’s bad? I think it is one thing when there is something wrong from a safety perspective, but what about when


30 The WaShingTOn POST Magazine | November 14, 2010


wonder how many other times I’ve been displeased with my meal and maybe sending it back would have been the smarter thing to do. If it is okay at a really expensive, fancy restaurant, what about at a more “everyday” type of place? Tom: Situations vary, as you point out. It’s one thing to get food that isn’t prepared correctly, another thing to receive a dish that simply isn’t to your liking. In the former case, you should


definitely send a mistake back; in the latter, I think honesty is the best policy. Restaurants don’t necessarily owe you something different if you discover, say, that you don’t like skate or liver after a bite or two. But a good establishment also doesn’t want to lose a customer or risk bad word-of-mouth by ignoring someone’s dissatisfaction. (Notice how your initial poor impression of the Spanish restaurant turned around after you piped up?) Keep in mind, however, that a lot of


“everyday” restaurants run on pretty slim profit margins, and the owner is going to have to eat a loss on a dish.


Fiftieth birthday celebration: I would


ILLUSTRATIONS BY EDWIN FOTHERINGHAM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168