WORLDNEWS
SVTC ranks global solar companies
European companies appear the most environmentally aware in a report from Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) who have released their 2010 Solar Company Scorecard. The scorecard ranks manufacturers of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules according to a range of factors including environmental health and safety, sustainability, workers’ rights, and social justice. Companies self-reported on these areas and the results serve as a resource for institutional purchasers, investors and consumers.
8
“Supporting SVTC’s groundbreaking research was significant because it is the first time that the social and environmental performance of solar companies has been assessed and compared. Solar power is key to helping solve the world’s climate crisis,” explained Sheila Davis, executive director of SVTC. “But the industry still faces serious issues that need to be addressed before it can be considered truly ‘clean and green’ and socially just.”
The 14 responding companies represented 24 percent of the 2008 module market share and 31 percent of the cumulative market share. The top three scores were earned by German manufacturers Calyxo, SolarWorld and Sovello, scoring 90, 88 and 73 respectively. The two U.S.-based respondents scored in the mid range: First Solar in Arizona received a score of 67 and Colorado-based Abound received a 63. The report also found that: 57% of respondents would support mandatory take back and recycling programs in the markets where they sell solar panels.
42.8% of companies are setting aside money to finance the collection and disposal of end-of-life panels and 50% said that they provide recycling services free of charge.
50% have undertaken analysis of their supply chain to document the social and environmental impacts associated with different production phases.
36% of companies said that they conduct lifecycle analyses or risk assessments on new chemicals, including nanomaterials.
“The solar industry needs high corporate responsibility standards if it is to fulfil its potential as a truly sustainable industry,” said Seb Beloe, head of sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) research at Henderson Global Investors, which sponsored the survey. “Supporting SVTC’s groundbreaking research was significant because it is the first time that the social and environmental performance of solar companies has been assessed and compared.”
“The solar industry can learn from other industries that have adopted responsible social, environmental and supply chain standards in order to prevent future problems,” added Steven Heim, director of social research and advocacy for Boston Common Asset Management, another sponsor. “SVTC’s research will help promote best practices by the solar industry.”
SVTC is calling for mandatory take back and responsible recycling by solar
companies as a step toward reducing the solar industry’s environmental footprint. As the solar industry works to replace fossil fuels, it is in the industry’s best interest to ensure that pollutants from the panels don’t enter the environment.
Only the solar producers can ensure that this will happen by eliminating toxic chemicals from their products and by taking responsibility for their environmental and health impacts throughout the entire lifecycle.
The Solar Company Scorecard follows the release of SVTC’s Toward a Just and Sustainable Solar Energy Industry report issued in January 2009 as part of the organization’s Clean and Just Solar Energy Campaign.
The report detailed the hazards related to the manufacturing and disposal of solar PV panels and recommends actions that the solar industry can take toward creating a sustainable sector.
www.solar-pv-management.com Issue II 2010
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104