HERITAGE BURR What If:
We’d Failed to Ratify Constitution?
New book imagines Aaron Burr establishing a separate nation. :: BY THOMAS K. LINDSAY
I
n our politically polarized times, it’s understandable that talk of a “national divorce,” that is, secession, gets
thrown around. But to those enamored
of disunification, a new book cautions, “Beware of what you wish for.” This is the thrust of
Chuck DeVore’s Crisis of the House Never United: A Novel of Early America. It is a work of historical fiction of the best kind — closely tied to historical reality, which it further illuminates through teasing out the consequences for America if, in fact, we had failed to approve the new Constitution submitted to the states in 1787. And, in reality, we almost failed to
ratify the Constitution. For example, in New York
— whose importance as a state made its approval of the new Constitution crucial — the state ratifying convention approved the Constitution by a narrow margin of only 30-27. The vote was 187 to 168 in Massachusetts, 57 to 47 in New
Hampshire, and 89 to 79 in Virginia. DeVore’s novel imagines
what might have happened had New Hampshire not ratified the Constitution in June 1788. DeVore paints for us one possible
Crisis of the House Never United: A Novel of Early America By Chuck DeVore
298 pages
scenario with Aaron Burr as the chief architect of the derailing. For this creative task, DeVore is well suited: He retired from the U.S. Army as a lieutenant colonel, having served in both the National Guard and the Reserves as an intelligence officer. He has served in the Pentagon, as a California assemblyman, and now, as chief national initiatives officer (and my colleague) at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. Some may already know that Burr, who served
as vice president during President Thomas Jefferson’s first term, was tried for treason. He was found not guilty in 1807, but the suspicion surrounding him — added to the hatred he brought on himself for killing Alexander Hamilton in their duel — ended his political hopes forever. In DeVore’s reimagined account,
Burr is clearly a traitor. Crisis of the House presents him forming a separate nation, the United American Republic, composed of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and
DeVore’s novel imagines what might have happened had New Hampshire not ratified the Constitution in June 1788.
82 NEWSMAX MAXLIFE | OCTOBER 2024
Delaware (and which occupied Boston and sent John Adams fleeing south). For support, Burr forges an alliance with Napoleon’s France. Burr’s tyrannical ambitions move
the other states finally to ratify the Constitution of 1787, helped by that Constitution’s crafty move of simply specifying nine states, rather than a percentage thereof, as necessary for ratification. The new U.S. government
then elected Jefferson as our first president, with Adams as his vice president. To blunt the support of France for Burr’s “Republic,” Jefferson has to turn to our former enemy, Great Britain, which is contemporaneously at war with Napoleon. What results from this deep
division could be expected: civil war. But this time, it’s Burr’s Northeast states versus Jefferson-Adams’ South. I won’t spoil how the projected battle turns out. Nor will I spoil the manner in
which DeVore reimagines Hamilton and Burr’s relationship. I will report that, as in real life, DeVore’s Burr is solely responsible for the death of Hamilton. But this occurs in a different manner than what happened in reality (the 1804 duel at Weehawken, New Jersey, from which Hamilton died a day later). Hamilton’s death in DeVore’s retelling is no less grim — in fact, more — than what really happened.
Thomas K. Lindsay is a distinguished senior fellow of higher education and constitutional studies at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.
HULTON ARCHIVE/GETTY IMAGES
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108