search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
An Election Like No Other


Newsmax political expert Mark Halperin on what makes this race so different.


A


uthor and Newsmax political analyst Mark Halperin shook


up the political world in July by breaking the news that President Joe Biden would soon drop out of the presidential election. Other pundits contested the


accuracy of that report — but as events unfolded, Halperin was proven right.


He sat down with Newsmax Magazine to talk about the race.


country,” Hirsen adds. “It’s happening in constituency groups that wouldn’t normally be found shifting over from the left to the center right.”


Future at Stake In a nation where the political divide is now so vast that pundits openly talk about a “cold civil war” between Republicans and Democrats, it’s worth noting that there re- mains at least one thing both parties agree on: America’s future quite likely hangs in the balance of this election. Republican and Democrat activists both predict that if the other party wins, it will


Continued on page 74


Newsmax: Has there ever been a race in the modern political age featuring this much chaos and unpredictability? Halperin: This election features unique elements: an assassination attempt and an incumbent president giving up the nomination. But think back to 1992, when Ross Perot in the spring of that election year as an independent was actually leading the race, and we saw the victory of a Democrat presidential candidate. Think about 2000 with the Florida


recount, and all the craziness brought to an election that was decided, in effect, by the Supreme Court. And then there was 2008, with


a three-way contest between John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama, plus the selection of Sarah Palin — a campaign I wrote a book


about, called Game Change. Certainly this cycle has been


extraordinary. But 1992, 2000, and 2008 were also very compelling, singular races.


Has the GOP done a good job defining Kamala Harris? One of the great ironies in the


switch from Biden to Harris is that, although [Donald] Trump is not technically the incumbent, he’s running with a lot of the disadvantages of an unpopular incumbent.


That means they have had to spend a lot of the summer and fall defining Harris on negative terms as best they could because she’s protected by the media, because she’s a more skilled performer than a lot of people gave her credit for. Because of the short time frame, they haven’t been able to do it in that robust a way. Probably the biggest problem has


been the reality that although Trump, in some circumstances, is a very formidable presidential candidate, the practice of reading opposition research, internalizing it, and really going out every day in a disciplined fashion and talking negatively about the other candidate — it’s just not his specialty. It’s alarming for Republicans who


felt they’d found themselves in a matchup where their candidate could do a lot of things on the campaign trail very well, but the thing he couldn’t do was bring discipline to dismantling somebody else at a time when that was all the party needed to win.


OCTOBER 2024 | NEWSMAX 73


HALPERIN/CRAIG BARRITT/GETTY IMAGES FOR SHOWTIME / MUSK/ DREW ANGERER/GETTY IMAGES / WOMEN/KEREM YUCEL/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108