home in either political party. That’s weird. Because in 2024,
the two parties are — at least on the immigration issue — morphing into one. Democrats and Republicans are competing to see who can be el mas macho in enforcing the law, deporting undocumented immigrants, and stopping future waves of migrants. Yet neither Trump nor Harris has done much for Hispanics. We’re invisible to them. In August, a New York Times/ Siena College poll of four battleground states — Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina — found that Harris got 54% of the Hispanic vote, compared to 40% for Trump. Those numbers are terrible for
Democrats, especially when you look at the national numbers. In 1996, Bill Clinton got 72% of the
Hispanic vote. In 2012, Barack Obama got 71%. In 2016, Hillary Clinton got 66%. In 2020, Biden got 60%. The GOP has reason to feel
optimistic. History shows that if a Republican earns the support of at least four out of 10 Hispanic voters
Democrats
cite concerns over lawfare
and the Biden administration’s potentially
unconstitutional effort to pressure Facebook,
Twitter, and other social media
firms to suppress free speech.
72 NEWSMAX | OCTOBER 2024
(see Ronald Reagan, who got 40% of the Hispanic vote in 1984, or George W. Bush, who got 44% in 2004), their Democrat opponent is doomed. For what it’s worth, during her
acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris dedicated only three sentences to immigration. “I know we can live up to our
proud heritage as a nation of immigrants and reform our broken immigration system,” she said. “We can create an earned pathway
to citizenship and secure our border. America, we must also be steadfast in advancing our security and our values abroad.” The Democrat presidential nominee offered no specifics about how she planned to do all that and make everyone happy. The answer to that question is, like the candidate herself, a mystery. Here’s the thing. It’s hard to get
excited about a mystery. It’s even harder to vote for one.
Ruben Navarrette is an author and syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate, and writes the Navarrette Nation newsletter at Substack.
Republican camp. On that fast-growing roster: Robert F.
Kennedy Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman, and a host of Silicon Valley financial and tech wiz- ards led by investor David Sacks. All of them have declared their sup-
port for Trump. Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel, meanwhile, has stated he will vote for Trump, but doesn’t plan to donate money to his campaign. Although the erstwhile Democrats’ ex-
planations for backing Trump vary, most of them cite concerns over lawfare and the Biden administration’s potentially uncon- stitutional effort to pressure Facebook, Twitter, and other social media firms to sup- press free speech. That was RFK Jr.’s focus when he threw
his support to Trump in August. “What alarms me,” he said, “is the resort
to censorship and media control and the weaponization of the federal agencies. “When a U.S. president colludes with or
outright coerces media companies to censor political speech,” he added, “it’s an attack on our most sacred right of free expression. And that’s the very right upon which all of our other constitutional rights rest.” Longtime Newsmax “Left Coast Report” columnist James Hirsen says: “When peo- ple like Elon Musk and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Donald Trump get together and ap- pear to be acting against their own personal interests — that’s quite compelling for a sig- nificant number of people. “And that’s why I think there’s a very powerful political and cultural shift in the
VOTE/ ROY ROCHLIN/GETTY IMAGES / RFK JR/REBECCA NOBLE/GETTY IMAGES
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108