search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Books


One-State Solution for Mideast Peace


It’s the only path to a safe, secure Israel, Ambassador David Friedman writes in his new bestseller.


One Jewish State: The Last, Best Hope to Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict By David Friedman Humanix Books, 256 pages, $29.99


A BY MARISA HERMAN


mbassador david fried- man always knew he wanted to share the stories behind the historic dip-


lomatic achievements that occurred while he was U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration. But his timeline was fast-tracked


by Hamas’ Oct. 7 terror attack on the Jewish State. After Friedman heard President


Joe Biden’s “tone deaf and insulting” reaction to the massacre of Israelis, he knew he had to respond to what he considered to be “exactly the wrong message.” “The idea that you’re going to


take a population that has essentially become radicalized and is excited and enthusiastic about murdering Jews and give them territory and boundar- ies, and a state and military, and a platform to destroy Israel, it just made no sense to me,” he said. As the Biden administration repeat-


edly promoted a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians, Friedman got to work writing his new book: One Jewish State: The Last, Best Hope to


Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. The architect behind the historic


Abraham Accords, which normal- ized relations between the Arab Gulf States and Israel, began detailing why a two-state solution that has failed for decades continues to be the wrong answer. If a two-state solution isn’t viable,


he’d find an alternative that could work. Friedman isn’t afraid to tackle


seemingly impossible issues. He helped overhaul U.S. policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict while serving as ambassador. He was responsible for helping


move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights. As Friedman outlines his plan for


solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he asks readers to keep an open mind. While people may consider the promotion of one Jewish State as a “radical view by a far-right author who wants to expand the land of Israel at the expense of Palestinians,” Fried- man said that is not the case. Rather, he called his blueprint a


“smart approach” that can appeal to deeply religious Jews who believe Isra- el is a “central tenet of our faith,” athe- ists who just want to see Israelis and Palestinians live in peace, or people in the middle who care about national security of the region or the economic implications.


As Friedman outlines his plan for solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he asks readers to keep an open mind.


58 NEWSMAX | OCTOBER 2024


“It’s not a real estate deal,” he said. Under Friedman’s model, Israel


takes control of the West Bank — also known as Judea and Samaria — and provides the Palestinians who live there with similar benefits and oppor- tunities that the nation provides to the 2 million Arab-Israeli citizens. While the Palestinians would be empowered and afforded educational opportunities, access to healthcare, and a slew of other benefits, Fried- man’s plan stops short of totally absorbing the Palestinian population into the land of Israel. He argues that doing so risks the


entire existence of a Jewish State, con- sidering many of the 2.5 million Pal- estinians are “extremely hostile to the State of Israel” and would ultimately “deprive Israel of its Jewish status.” He noted that after the Oct. 7 ter-


ror attack, polling indicated that more than 80% of Palestinians supported Hamas’ stunning massacre. Under Friedman’s concept, Pales-


tinians would have control over some local affairs, but they would not be permitted to vote in national elections.


DEBBIE HILL/POOL/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108