PEER POLL FACILITIES 50
SURVEY
Every post house in the Facilities 50 can vote for the rivals they admire. Here we run through the top ten most voted for companies and show some of the reasons they get the thumbs up
01
FRAMESTORE It’s another year at the top of
the Peer Poll for Framestore with rival companies describing it as a “beacon for fabulous UK work worldwide” that is widely admired for its “R&D and creativity” its “ingenuity” and its “amazing projects across film, TV, immersive and advertising” its “top quality creative output” and its “consistently brilliant CG work.”
03= TIME 02
ENVY In at second this time in the Peer
Poll is Envy with its admirers pointing to its “continued growth whilst retaining a high level of service and quality” with others pointing to the breadth of its work “across a broad range of content types from features to episodic and documentaries” and its “commercials concentration in addition to broadcast.”
BASED ARTS Time Based Arts is feted by rivals due to its “cutting edge creativity” and its “quality of output.” Others vote for the company because of its “fantastic attention to detail. All their projects look like they have really bought something to the final result.” And others say the “focus is in the right place, on the creativity and quality of output.”
07= FILMS AT 59 In at joint seventh in the Peer Poll is
Bristol’s Films at 59. Rival companies pick it out because its “variety and quality of work and genres always impresses.” Others say the company has “nice people with a strong regional brand and loyal clients” while others say its “quality of work is second to none and approach and friendliness is a real tonic in a sometimes cutthroat sector.”
05 THE MILL It’s fifth place in the Peer Poll
this year for The Mill with its rival companies describing it as the “leader in their field for commercials.” Others pick it out because it “continues to generate great work and volume” with other companies picking out its “talent and skill” along with its “commerciality and business acumen.”
07= GOLDCREST Goldcrest’s voters are “impressed
by the standard of their work” and say of the company that it “continues to move forward into HETV and has amazing in house talent.” Other rival facilities say Goldcrest is one of the “biggest privately owned boutique facilities in the UK. Very talent driven.” With others admiring it for “the best audio facilities in Soho for feature film mixing.”
Winter 2020 F16 03=
THE FARM At equal third is The Farm. Rival
companies praise The Farm for “its presence in the industry” and for being “huge and reliable.” Others pick the post house out for its “quality of work, clever people and history” while others say that it “continues to invest to stay at the forefront of technology and is always somewhere we look to, to see what is current in the industry.”
06 MPC In at sixth in the Facilities 50
Peer Poll this time is MPC with its admirers pointing to its “size and ability to take on large projects.” The company’s feature work is also picked out with other facilities saying that MPC is “leading in their field for film” with others also pointing to the company “for their grading and film work”
07= HALO Halo places seventh in this year’s
Peer Poll with voters pointing to its “cross-genre post production” and its “wide spectrum, including high end features.” Others pick out Halo for its ethos calling it “honest and open” and say the “team are great at adapting to changes and challenges.” and “deliver amazing programming yet retain a SME business approach.”
televisual.com
UNTOLD STUDIOS Three facilities share equal tenth in this year’s Peer Poll. Fifty Fifty is described as a “boutique facility offering high end post solutions” with a “great team.” Rivals say Molinare is a “45 year old stalwart of the post industry that continues to reinvent and adapt.” And Untold is noted as “a modern vfx company producing an extremely high level of work.”
=10 FIFTY FIFTY; MOLINARE;
Win-
tele-
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133
