search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BETTER CHANGE


The motivation matrix of safer gambling


Better Change’s ambassador, Adam Russell, explores the motivation matrix of safer gambling and how operators can ‘double down’ on positive play to improve their existing processes.


I


n Better Change’s previous article, “Have we taken Safer Gambling too far?”, our engagement director Rob Mabbett explained that the current approach of introducing punitive restrictions which block, ban, restrict and stigmatise gambling are not working. As a result, this is demotivating both the industry and its consumers to engage with safer gambling. Contrastingly, and as explored in my article below, Better Change advocates that operators double down on positive play as a way of implementing more effective safer gambling measures which engage with and protect the entirety of the gambling population instead of only those who are acutely affected by such measures. Motivation. Everyone is motivated by something. That applies to people and companies, though - as the Gambling


20 MAY 2024


Commission frequently reminds gambling operators - these should be considered one and the same when it comes to ascribing responsibility for safer gambling outputs: companies are ultimately defined by the collections of people who make decisions within them. In the Gambling Commission’s Compliance and Enforcement report of 2020-2021, it was emphasised that “Businesses do not make decisions – people do. This is why the Commission continues to ensure that personal licence holders are held accountable, where appropriate, for the regulatory failings within the operators they manage.” Indeed, there is an emerging pattern that the Gambling Commission will often bring enforcement action against personal management licence holders after they have brought action against the operator, with reference to the same perceived safer


gambling failures. So, what motivates the people within gambling operators to double down on positive play? Why is this important? How can operators increase focus on positive play? These are the questions that I will explore throughout the remainder of this article.


The gambling industry has become uniquely structured and motivated. It has evolved into an industry where ethics, the legal/regulatory landscape and commercial metrics now align into a multifaceted incentive which motivates operators to ensure that gambling takes place in a safe manner. Doing the right thing from an ethical perspective looks the same as rigidly following the ever-tightening laws and regulations. This approach in turn protects the commercial viability of a gambling business in the short and long term, not least by protecting the longevity of


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76