search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE


income when leasing, it is said that basic rate taxpayers would get a 30% effective support on their monthly lease, and the deduction scales naturally with income tax/NICs, but is still substantial for lower earners. Plus, it works for the self- employed via their self-assessment declarations. Ellis argues that this leasing and subscription model will be more affordable and lessen the upfront investment in an electric bike, which is putting so many potential buyers off, particularly as the cost-of-living crisis shows no sign of abating. Of course, leasing would cover insurance, servicing, theft concerns with recovery services and trackers built in, plus offer up all the other essentials to make the cycle a practical item for daily use. Later on, riders can swap, upgrade, pause or return the cycle, building in the flexibility that families need when circumstances change. Meanwhile, monthly outgoings would be benchmarked against the cash flow of low-income households. All the while, the independent bike shop gets a shot in the arm that it so direly needs, perhaps minus a slice of its margin. Naturally, with all of these things considered and with too many fresh sideline issues surrounding e-bikes and Government budgets to count, the Cycle to Work scheme, it’s rumoured, has the Government’s attention. At the time of writing, we do not have the luxury of an Autumn budget update, and it’s not entirely beyond the realms of possibility


that a cash-strapped treasury might do something none of us are expecting in relation to the scheme. We are aware that the All Party Parliamentary Group for


Walking and Cycling has the issue of Cycle to Work reform somewhat on its radar, in large part down to the perceived inequality issues being raised with MPs. It is fair to say that inequality remains baked in, with the greatest earners getting the most generous benefits, while those on low incomes – arguably those who most need cheap, active mobility – remained totally sidelined. Steve Edgell, a bike retailer, Cycle to Work Scheme facilitator and Chair of the Cycle to Work Alliance, says that it would be a big mistake to make knee-jerk cuts, if Rachel Reeves were so inclined. He says, “The Cycle to Work scheme is a proven, cost-effective mechanism for driving cycling uptake. It delivers clear economic benefits by supporting sustainable transport, reducing congestion, improving public health, and lowering emissions - all of which generate long- term savings for the economy and the NHS. “It supports employees in accessing active, low-carbon,


and affordable travel – with average annual savings of £1,262 (rising to £1,600 in London) – while sustaining the cycling retail sector and helping employers promote healthier and more productive workforces. Protecting and building on this success to widen access further should be the priority.” 


www.bikebiz.com


October 2025 | 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68