levs from the club to the studio
On stage, that silent bond becomes amplified, altering the flow of the night in ways only they can sense.
Every duo has to negotiate the line between instinct and structure, and LEVS has found its rhythm in the tension.
“It is probably something like 70 percent instinct and 30 percent planning,” they admit. A playlist is always built in advance, a foundation that anchors them, but once they step into the booth, the room becomes the map.
“The connection with the crowd is what shapes the direction of the set.”
One leans closer to the architect, the other to the risk-taker, but the set only clicks when both roles fuse into one flow.
LEVS’s productions carry the same raw electricity as their sets: bold, intense, yet layered with atmosphere. The seed of that energy almost always comes from the club.
“Clubs definitely inspire us. There is something about the energy of the night, the people you meet, and the atmosphere that stays with you long after,” they reflect. One moment that crystallized this was when we opened for Outworld. Nerves were heavy at first, but instead of freezing, that tension became the ignition.
“Once we stepped into it, the nerves transformed into pure connection. It felt like we were not just performing, we became one with the ravers, part of the same pulse.”
That night still reverberates in their studio, shaping the way they approach their music.
Working together as sisters could easily become combustible, yet LEVS has found a way to transform friction into forward motion.
“Of course, we see things differently so- metimes, but instead of turning that into conflict, we have learned to approach it with calm and respect,” they explain.
Those moments are not about one winning over the other; they are about unlocking new paths.
“At the end of the day, we understand that we are two different people, and those differences can help us spark new ideas.”
What might derail other duos becomes a creative resource, a built-in catalyst that keeps the project evolving.
The global electronic landscape is overflowing with duos, collectives, and solo DJs. Being twins could easily be reduced to a gimmick, but LEVS have worked hard to ensure the focus remains on their artistry.
“Being twins is naturally the first thing people notice, but for us it has never been the focus. The music always co- mes first,” they say.
Their twin connection is a tool, not a brand. What sets them apart is not the bloodline but the vision: a determina- tion to craft atmospheres that carry emotion, texture, and journey.
“We want people to connect with the emotion and the journey in the music.”
ON VULNERABILITY AND AUTHENTICITY
The DJ world demands an image of per- fection, impeccable sets, immaculate branding, and curated posts that leave no room for flaws. Yet the paradox is apparent: audiences often connect most deeply with honesty, with the cracks in the façade. LEVS acknowledges the weight of that pressure.
“The pressure to be not only a DJ but also an influencer often creates an unrealistic image of perfection, flawless mixes,
flawless posts,” they admit.
For them, perfection was never the point of electronic music. Vulnerabi- lity is present, but it is rarely literal. Instead, they channel it through the music itself, embedding honesty in the atmosphere rather than social media captions.
branding, flawless
“It does not mean it is not there. We just channel it differently.”
The sound of LEVS is immediately re- cognizable: high-energy techno that hits with force yet wraps itself in hyp- notic textures and groove. The sisters never sat down to design it with inten- tion.
“It happened naturally. The sound you hear now is really the result of our ongoing evolution as DJs and produ- cers. Looking ahead, we are defini- tely curious to push boundaries and explore new sounds. It allows us not to stay locked into one category and gives us the freedom to grow, experiment, and discover more about ourselves and our music.”
The launch of their label, Conscious
Mind, was more than a business move; it was a declaration of independence. Within months of producing, they decided to take complete control of their music.
“One of our main motivations was to have full control over our releases and manage them directly, without depending
on Creating our external decisions. the freedom to shape our
own label gave us sound,
experiment without limits, and build a community around our
vision. For
us, the label represents a realm of li- mitless exploration, a place where unconventional ideas can find their voice and where connections are nurtured that reach far beyond the mu- sic itself.”
Erika and Laura are not chasing gimmicks, they are not selling per- fection, and they are not trying to outshine each other. They are thou- ghtful, humble, and patient, protec- ting their individuality while choosing to merge into something greater when the music calls for it. Conflict becomes fuel, nerves become connection, and vulnerability becomes atmosphere.
LEVS are less about the spectacle of being twins and more about the integrity of being artists, curators, and human beings who understand that imperfection is where the pulse truly lies. That is why their story resonates: two voices that never lose themselves, yet choose to become one when the night demands it.
89
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200
