search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ANAESTHETIC GASES


professionals, who are regularly exposed to the gas in the work environment. In most countries nitrous oxide programmes have exposure limits for healthcare professionals. Known as threshold limits, they stipulate how much exhaled gas staff are allowed to be exposed to. These also apply in the UK, meaning that, alongside a high room air exchange rate, inhaled and exhaled gas from patients should be controlled in a closed system. Therefore, exhaled gas should be captured by an exhalation hose, and moved away from where it may affect staff. This process of collection and removal is called scavenging.


Although the effects of exposure to nitrous oxide are still uncertain, and the literature is inconclusive, the effects can vary from headache, to dizziness, to loss of concentration and focus on the treatment of patients.5


These possible


effects are not in the best interests of either the professional or the patient, who expects total focus on the procedure. In Scandinavia, closed systems for delivering nitrous oxide gas mixes to patients are used routinely to capture and destroy the gas locally, making it a ‘win-win’ situation for everyone concerned and the environment.


Nitrous oxide uses in Scandinavia The use of closed delivery systems and the threshold limits for staff exposure are governed by national guidelines across Scandinavia. Hospitals have technicians and work environment specialists that make sure that guidelines are correct and followed. Medical equipment is used for inhalation and exhalation, and gases captured via pipeline systems, which are designed by hospital gas system contractors. The exhaled gas from patients goes to a gas outlet in the treatment room, and from here a gas evacuation pipeline transports it to a mechanical services room. Hospitals will have a central destruction unit in place, as there are many rooms that support the nitrous oxide programme. In the same hospital there may be a paediatric and an emergency department supporting patients with nitrous oxide. In this case, there is no gas evacuating pipeline. The amount of nitrous oxide used is small by both volume and frequency, so here hospitals would use the mobile destruction unit.


In Sweden, all hospitals with a nitrous oxide programme are aware of the solutions for capturing and destroying it. Given that even a small volume of nitrous oxide leads to a very high CO2


emission


value, failure to install the solution would result in a heavy local carbon dioxide footprint. For example, the University Hospital Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen calculated that nitrous oxide use for its maternity department in 2018 was


82 Health Estate Journal October 2021


Malene Hegenberger, a Danish midwife, works daily with nitrous oxide to support her patients.


4,514 kilograms. Determining the CO2 equivalency by multiplying by 298 means that the department alone emitted the equivalent of 1,345,172 tons of carbon dioxide.


Compelling environmental case The environmental case is compelling. By installing a central destruction unit connected to the gas evacuation system, 99% of these CO2


from the hospital’s nitrous oxide programme. Compared with other possible CO2


emissions solutions, this


technology requires a relatively small investment, but delivers a huge beneficial impact on the hospital’s total carbon footprint.


Sweden came to this conclusion in 2011, after installing central destruction units in 12 different hospitals. The ‘Destruction of Medical N2


O in Sweden’ report6


compared both lifecycle assessment and lifecycle cost for this technology with other methods of reducing the CO2 footprint in healthcare settings. The conclusion was that destruction was a good and competitive investment, and that the collection of exhaled gas for destruction supported efforts to reduce the negative effect on occupational health. Since then, as the energy consumption required for destruction technology has decreased, the investment is even more attractive today.


Taking a green leaf out of Scandinavia’s book


Optimising the running and maintenance of hospitals and other healthcare facilities and the delivery of clinical care is at the heart of the NHS mission, and a major focus of sustainability, with interventions already being implemented across NHS


A mobile destruction unit is deployed in settings where there are no gas evacuation pipelines – such as emergency departments, and in clinical spaces used for orthopaedics, endoscopy, paediatrics, and ambulatory care.


estates and facilities. With the nitrous oxide evolution beginning to take shape in the UK, there is now an opportunity to take this a step further – and progress is already being made across the UK. The destruction programme developed by Medclair in Sweden is now being trialled in hospitals in Manchester, Newcastle, and


emissions are removed


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112