search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Doing social science with conservation 89


FREEMAN,S.&SCHULLER,M.(2020) Aid projects: the effects of commodification and exchange. World Development, 126, 104731.


GIBSON,C.&WARREN,A. (2020) Keeping time with trees: climate change, forest resources, and experimental relations with the future. Geoforum, 108, 325–337.


GOODMAN,R.(2020) Getting creative with data: managing relationships and quantitative proof in an Indian NGO. American Anthropologist, 122, 799–813.


GRIFFIN, C.J., JONES,R.&ROBERTSON, I.J.M. (2019) Moral Ecologies: Histories of Conservation, Dispossession and Resistance. Palgrave Macmillian, London, UK.


HAENN,N. (2016) The middle-class conservationist: social dramas, blurred identity boundaries, and their environmental consequences in Mexican conservation. Current Anthropology: AWorld Journal of the Sciences of Man, 57, 197–218.


HODGSON, D.E. & FRED, M. (eds) (2019) The Projectification of the Public Sector. Routledge, New York, USA.


KELLEY, P.H. & DIETL, G.P. (2022) Core competencies for training conservation paleobiology students in a wicked world. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 851014.


KIIK,L.(2019) Conservationland: toward the anthropology of professionals in global nature conservation. Critique of Anthropology, 39, 391–419.


KOOT, S., HEBINCK,P.&SULLIVAN,S.(2023) Science for success—a conflict of interest? Researcher position and reflexivity in socio- ecological research for CBNRM in Namibia. Society & Natural Resources, 36, 554–572.


KRAUSE,M.(2014) The Good Project: Humanitarian Relief NGOs and the Fragmentation of Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.


LI, T.M. (2016) Governing rural Indonesia: convergence on the project system. Critical Policy Studies, 10, 79–94.


LOWE,C. (2013) Wild Profusion: Biodiversity Conservation in an Indonesian Archipelago. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.


LUNDIN, R.A. (2016) Project Society: paths and challenges. Project Management Journal, 47, 7–15.


LYONS,A. (2013) The rise and fall of a second-generation CBNRM project in Zambia: insights from a project perspective. Environmental Management, 51, 365–378.


MASSARELLA, K., NYGREN, A., FLETCHER, R., BÜSCHER, B., KIWANGO,W.A., KOMI, S. et al. (2021) Transformation beyond conservation: how critical social science can contribute to a radical new agenda in biodiversity conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 79–87.


METCALF, E.C.,MOHR, J.J.,YUNG, L.,METCALF,P.&CRAIG,D.(2015) The role of trust in restoration success: public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social-ecological system. Restoration Ecology, 23, 315–324.


MILLER, D.C., SCALES, I.R.&MASCIA, M.B. (eds) (2023) Conservation Social Science: Understanding People, Conserving Biodiversity. Wiley, Chichester, UK.


MILNE,S. (2022) Corporate Nature: An Insider’s Ethnography of Global Conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, USA.


MONTANA, J., ELLIOTT, L., RYAN,M.&WYBORN,C.(2020) The need for improved reflexivity in conservation science. Environmental Conservation, 47, 217–219.


MOON, K., BLACKMAN, D.A., ADAMS, V.M., COLVIN, R.M., DAVILA, F., EVANS, M.C. et al. (2019) Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 294–302.


MOSSE,D.(2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Pluto Press, London, UK, and Ann Arbor, USA.


MÜNSTER,U.(2016)Working for the forest: the ambivalent intimacies of human–elephant collaboration in south Indian wildlife conservation. Ethnos, 81, 425–447.


NEIMARK,B. (2023) Hottest of the Hotspots: The Rise of Eco-Precarious Conservation Labor in Madagascar. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, USA.


OJHA, H., NIGHTINGALE, A.J., GONDA, N.,MUOK, B.O., ERIKSEN, S., KHATRI,D.&PAUDEL,D.(2022) Transforming environmental governance: critical action intellectuals and their praxis in the field. Sustainability Science, 17, 621–635.


PALMER,A.(2020) Ethical Debates in Orangutan Conservation. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.


PARREÑAS, J.S. (2018) Decolonizing Extinction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation. Duke University Press, Durham, USA.


PEREZ,P.(2010) Deep-rooted hopes and green entanglements: implementing Indigenous Peoples rights and nature-conservation in the Philippines and Indonesia. PhD thesis. Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.


PERRY,B.(2022) Co-production as praxis: critique and engagement from within the university. Methodological Innovations, 15, 341–352.


PETERS, R.W. (2020) Implementing Inequality: The Invisible Labor of International Development. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, USA.


PETERSON, R.B., RUSSEL, D.,WEST,P.&BROSIUS, J.P. (2010) Seeing (and doing) conservation through cultural lenses. Environmental Management, 45, 5–18.


PIENKOWSKI, T., KIIK, L., CATALANO, A., HAZENBOSCH, M., IZQUIERDO-TORT, S., KHANYARI, M. et al. (2023) Recognizing reflexivity among conservation practitioners. Conservation Biology, 37,e14022.


RICE,W.S., SOWMAN,M.R. & BAVINCK,M. (2020) Using theory of change to improve post-2020 conservation: a proposed framework and recommendations for use. Conservation Science and Practice, 2,e301.


RILES,A. (2007) The Network Inside Out. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA.


SAIF, O., STADDON,S. & KEANE,A.(2023) Fieldwork in conservation organisations: a review of methodological challenges, opportunities and ethics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 248-265.


SANDBROOK, C., ADAMS,W.M., BÜSCHER,B. & VIRA,B.(2013) Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 27, 1487–90.


SANDBROOK, C., SCALES, I.R., VIRA,B.&ADAMS,W.M. (2011) Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology, 25, 285–294.


SAULS, L.A. & LÓPEZ ILLESCAS,V.(2023) Redefining rights-based conservation through philanthropy: the ford foundation in Mesoamerica. Conservation Science and Practice, 5,e12942.


SAYER,J.&WELLS, M.P. (2004) The pathology of projects. In Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work (eds T. McShane & M.P. Wells), pp. 35–48. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.


SAYER, J., SUNDERLAND, T., GHAZOUL, J., PFUND, J.-L., SHEIL, D., MEIJAARD, E. et al. (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8349–8356.


SCHREER,V.(2023) The absent agent: orangutans, communities, and conservation in Indonesian Borneo. Conservation and Society, 21, 17–27.


SODIKOFF,G.(2009) The low-wage conservationist: biodiversity and perversities of value in Madagascar. American Anthropologist, 111, 443–455.


STADDON,S.(2021) Recognising and resisting injustice: knowledge practices and politics amongst Nepal’s community forestry professionals. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History, 8, 5.


Oryx, 2025, 59(1), 81–90 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324000747


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140