30 R. A. Shidqi et al.
MERINO, G., MURUA, H., SANTIAGO, J., ARRIZABALAGA,H. & RESTREPO,V. (2020) Characterization, communication, and management of uncertainty in tuna fisheries. Sustainability, 12, 8245.
MIZRAHI, M., DUCE, S., PRESSEY, R.L., SIMPFENDORFER, C.A., WEEKS,R.&DIEDRICH,A.(2019) Global opportunities and challenges for shark large marine protected areas. Biological Conservation, 234, 107–115.
MURUA, H., SEMBA,Y.&BÁEZ,J.(2018) Updated Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for Shark Species Caught in Fisheries Managed by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). 21st Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee, Mahé, Seychelles.
NEWING,H. (2010) Conducting Research in Conservation. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
NULHAQIM, S.A., FEDRYANSYAH,M.&HIDAYAT, E.N. (2019) Resolusi Konflik Agraria Berbasis Komunitas Pada Masyarakat Petani Di Desa Genteng Kecamatan Sukasari Kebupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 1, 70–78.
O’MALLEY, M.P., LEE-BROOKS,K.&MEDD, H.B. (2013) The global economic impact of Manta ray watching tourism. PLOS One, 8,e65051.
OYANEDEL, R., GELCICH,S.&MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2020) Motivations for (non-)compliance with conservation rules by small-scale resource users. Conservation Letters, 13,e12725.
PATIL, B., SINGH, K., PAWAR, S., MAARSE,L.&OTTE,J.(2009) Sericulture: An Alternative Source of Income to Enhance the Livelihoods of Small-Scale Farmers and Tribal Communities. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. openknowledge.
fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/54bfbee7-88e4-4a96-8029- d12fb5266a2f/content [accessed November 2024].
PERRY, G.L.W., RICHARDSON, S.J., HARRÉ, N., HODGES, D., LYVER, P.O.,MASEYK, F.J.F. et al. (2021) Evaluating the role of social norms in fostering pro-environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 620125.
PLATTEAU, J.-P. (2004) Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35, 223–246.
RASTOGI, A., HICKEY, G.M., BADOLA,R.&HUSSAIN, S.A. (2014) Understanding the local socio-political processes affecting conservation management outcomes in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Management, 53, 913–929.
REDDY, S.M.W., MONTAMBAULT, J., MASUDA, Y.J., KEENAN, E., BUTLER,W., FISHER, J.R.B. et al. (2017) Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior. Conservation Letters, 10, 248–256.
REDPATH, S.M., BHATIA,S.&YOUNG,J.(2015) Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx, 49, 222–225.
REED, M.S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431.
RIGBY, C.L., BARRETO, R., CARLSON, J., FERNANDO, D., FORDHAM, S., FRANCIS, M.P. et al. (2019) Alopias
pelagicus.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019.
dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3. RLTS.T161597A68607857.en.
RIM-RUKEH, A., IRERHIEVWIE,G. & AGBOZU, I.E. (2013) Traditional beliefs and conservation of natural resources: evidences from selected communities in Delta State. Nigeria, 5, 426–432.
ROE, D., BOOKER, F.,DAY, M., ZHOU,W.,ALLEBONE-WEBB, S.,HILL, N.A.O. et al. (2015) Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements? Environmental Evidence, 4, 22.
ROGERS, P.J. &WEISS, C.H. (2007) Theory-based evaluation: reflections ten years on: theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007, 63–81.
ROOSIHERMIATIE, B., PRATIWI, N.L., RUKMINI, R.&J.P.,W.(2015) Analysis of implementation the policy on malaria elimination in Indonesia. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 18, 20953.
SAINSBURY, K., BURGESS, N.D., SABUNI, F., HOWE, C., PUIS, E., KILLENGA,R.&MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2015) Exploring stakeholder perceptions of conservation outcomes from alternative income generating activities in Tanzanian villages adjacent to Eastern Arc Mountain forests. Biological Conservation, 191, 20–28.
SANDBROOK, C., NELSON, H.P., BOLDERSON,S. & LEADER- WILLIAMS,N. (2021) Evaluating the impact of the first 10 years of the Cambridge Masters in Conservation Leadership. Oryx, 5, 710–719.
SETYAWAN, E., ERDMANN, M., GUNADHARMA, N., GUNAWAN,T., HASAN, A., IZUAN,M. et al. (2022)Aholistic approach to manta ray conservation in the Papuan bird’s head seascape: resounding success, ongoing challenges. Marine Policy, 137, 104953.
SHIDQI, R., SARI, D.R., CAPRIATI,A.&KURNIASIH, E.M. (2019) Population Risk and Alternative Fisheries Management of Thresher Sharks in Indonesia. Final report for the Conservation Leadership Programme, Cambridge, UK.
conservationleadershipprogramme.org/project/thresher-sharks- indonesia [accessed November 2024].
SHIDQI, R.A., ERDMANN, M., SETYAWAN, E., LEZAMA-OCHOA, N., SARI, D.R., SIANIPAR, A.B. et al. (2024) Identifying spatial movements and residency of pelagic thresher sharks (Alopias pelagicus) using satellite and passive acoustic telemetry to inform local conservation in central Indonesia. Frontiers in Fish Science, 2, 1391062.
SIMPFENDORFER, C.A., HEUPEL, M.R.,WHITE,W.T., DULVY, N.K., SIMPFENDORFER, C.A., HEUPEL, M.R. et al. (2011) The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis. Marine and Freshwater Research, 62, 518–527.
STERLING, E.J., BETLEY, E., SIGOUIN, A., GOMEZ, A., TOOMEY, A., CULLMAN, G. et al. (2017) Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 209, 159–171.
ST JOHN, F.A.V., EDWARDS-JONES,G.&JONES, J.P.G. (2010) Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology.Wildlife Research, 37, 658.
TANG, C.-P.&TANG, S.-Y. (2001) Negotiated autonomy: transforming self-governing institutions for local common-pool resources in two tribal villages in Taiwan. Human Ecology, 29, 49–67.
VILMA, Ž.(2018) Implementing ethical principles in social research: challenges, possibilities and limitations. Vocational Training: Research and Realities, 29, 19–43.
WEISS, C.H. (1997) How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review, 21, 501–524.
WHITE,H. (2009) Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1, 271–284.
WICANDER,S.&COAD,L.(2018) Can the provision of alternative livelihoods reduce the impact of wild meat hunting in west and Central Africa? Conservation and Society, 16, 441–458.
WRIGHT, J.H., HILL, N.A.O., ROE, D., ROWCLIFFE, J.M., KÜMPEL, N.F., DAY, M. et al. (2016) Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods. Conservation Biology, 30, 7–13.
WULAN, Y.C., YASMI, Y., PURBA,C.&WOLLENBERG,E.(2004) Analisa Konflik: Sektor Kehutanan di Indonesia 1997–2003. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Oryx, 2025, 59(1), 19–30 © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001376
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140
