search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Yellow‐footed rock‐wallaby in Queensland 125


FIG.1 Petrogale xanthopus celeris distribution, central-western Queensland, Australia, 2010–2023. The map shows major towns, rivers, ranges, national parks (NPs; hatched), the dingo barrier fence (dashed line) and more recent (post-2010) wild dog and macropod exclusion fences (grey lines), and sites where rock-wallabies were abundant, common, uncommon or absent during the 2010–2015 and 2020–2023 surveys. Where presence or abundance differed between survey periods, the more recent score is used.


extensively cleared and sown with introduced buffel grass Cenchrus ciliaris.Most of the study area is under commercial livestock grazing leases, although sheep and cattle are mostly restricted to valleys and lower slopes of the ranges. Four na- tional parks occur within the study area (Fig. 1). Feral goats are common in some areas, and there are high numbers of common wallaroos and localized occurrences of feral horses Equus caballus throughout the area. Eastern grey kangaroos Macropus giganteus and red kangaroos Osphranter rufus are mostly restricted to the lower slopes and valleys. Dingoes Canis familiaris, cats and foxes occur throughout the study area, although little is known of their densities. Fires are rare because of naturally sparse groundcover, although some mulga Acacia aneura and shrubby tablelands may burn be- cause of accumulation of vegetation biomass (mostly grasses) after exceptionally wet seasons.


Methods Survey timing and participants


The present study involved two separate survey periods: May 2010–June 2015 (although mostly 2010–2013), and September 2020–June 2023 (Table 1). Details of the main participants in these surveys are provided in the Author contributions section, with others who assisted on single field trips named in the Acknowledgements section.


Site relocation, additional site selection and survey methodology


We relocated sites previously surveyed opportunistically during the 1970s (Gordon et al., 1978) or by targeted searches


undertaken during 1983–1987 (Gordon et al., 1993) as accur- ately as possible using original site maps and notes and inspection of satellite imagery via Google Earth (Google, USA). We also surveyed locations of all other historical re- cords. We located additional sites using Google Earth to de- tect deep gorges and dense vegetation.Wesurveyed another 35 sites for P. xanthopus celeris outside its known distribu- tion (Fig. 1). Sites varied in size (0.5–2.0 ha) and were de- fined by habitat characteristics favoured by yellow-footed rock-wallabies, typically a gorge, boulder field or escarp- ment. Some sites encompassed multiple habitat elements. We placed sites at least 1.5 km apart (Sharp, 2009, showed that individuals typically have a home range of ,1 km2 but can travel up to 1.5 km to drink) or separated by .1 km of unsuitable (non-range) habitat or an exclusion fence (Smith & Allen, 2021) that would be impenetrable to P. xanthopus celeris.We only recorded time of site visit and total survey effort (person-minutes) in the 2020–2023 sur- veys; we calculated these data through GPS waypoint and photo times where possible for the 2010–2015 surveys, but these data are unknown for the 1970s–1980s surveys. We based the data recorded at each site on the


1970s–1980s surveys (Gordon et al., 1993) and included land- scape features (presence or absence of the following: cliffs or gorges, fissures/passages in the rock face, rocky terraces, caves and boulders, and, where present, the estimated max- imum height of cliffs and boulders); vegetation composition and structure on tablelands and slopes; total number of P. xanthopus celeris individuals sighted during survey site visits (we provide this as aminimum; if we suspected an in- dividual could have been seen more than once, we did not recount it); maximum density of rock-wallaby dung per


Oryx, 2025, 59(1), 123–135 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324000760


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140