search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Claire’s mouse lemur 115


2007). Future surveys of the isolated mainland populations and their habitats, which are currently under no formal pro- tection, could identify suitable locations for establishing additional protected areas (Olivieri et al., 2007) and restor- ing forest connectivity to maximize the capacity of the spe- cies to respond to future climate change (Hannah et al., 2008; Hending et al., 2022a). Microcebus mamiratra is also reported to occupy mangrove habitats (Gardner, 2016), and although our surveys did not incorporate this habitat type, future research could elucidate the relative importance of mangroves to this species. Lokobe National Park itself is difficult to survey. The ter-


rain is steep, and slippery underfoot in the wet season, with several ravines and large boulders complicating access and transect placement. Although we were able to place transects in the northern parts of the Park, we abandoned attempts to do so in the south as itwas too difficult to cut straight transects and potentially unsafe for nocturnal work. Future surveys in Lokobe National Park could consider point transect surveys, which would allow observers to use safe and accessible routes when navigating between points (Axel & Maurer, 2011). In conclusion, Nosy Be harbours significant numbers of


Claire’s mouse lemur, an Endangered primate with a re- stricted and severely fragmented geographical range. To safeguard its long-term survival, we recommend: (1)a focus of conservation efforts in Nosy Be on the unprotected secondary and degraded forests, with consideration given to direct household payments for conservation and to ecotour- ism initiatives, and (2) future surveys of the mainland popu- lations and their habitats, with a view to establishing additional protected areas and forest connectivity.


Author contributions Study design: all authors; fieldwork: LDM, HR, ESN; data analysis: LDM; writing: LDM, AMB.


Acknowledgements This research project was funded by Re:wild’s Lemur Conservation Action Fund and the Australian National University’s Primate Conservation Travel Grant, for which we are grateful. We thank the Ministère de l’Environnement et du Dèveloppement Durable for research permission and Dr Jean Freddy Ranaivoarisoa and the Mention Anthropobiologie et Développement Durable at the University of Antananarivo for their assistance obtain- ing the permit; the directors of Lokobe National Park, Gérard Bakarizafy and Landisoa Randimbison; the staff of Madagascar National Parks, Franck Tanasi Tombomanana, Omar Mohamad Assany, Said Mohamad Assany and Joël Tianjara; our guides from the Comités Locaux du Parc at Nosy Be, Udo-Heiss Jaozafy, Tavandra Mohibo Mamoudou, Avilaza, Kadra Odile, Alphonsine Tina and Mohammad; the landowners and village presidents of Marodoka, Antafondro, Ampasipohy and Ambatozavavy for per- mission to access and conduct our research on their lands; and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards, was approved by the Australian National University’s Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (protocol


#A2022/30) and was carried out in accordance with applicable national laws of Madagascar and Australia. Research permission was obtained from the Ministère de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable (#346/22/MEDD/SG/DGGE/DAPRNE/SCBE.Re).


Data availability The data that support the results of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


References


AGAPOW, P.-M., BININDA-EMONDS, O.R.P., CRANDALL, K.A., GITTLEMAN, J.L., MACE, G.M., MARSHALL, J.C. et al. (2004) The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 161–179.


AKAIKE,H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory (eds B.N. Petrov & F. Csaki), pp. 267–281. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.


ANDERSON, D.R. (2001) The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 1294–1297.


ANDREONE, F., GUARINO, F.M. & RANDRIANIRINA, J.E. (2005) Life history traits, age profile, and conservation of the panther chameleon, Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier 1829), at Nosy Be, NW Madagascar. Tropical Zoology, 18, 209–225.


ANDRIAMBELOSON, J.B., BLANCO, M.B., ANDRIANTSALOHIMISANTATRA, A., RIVOHARISON, T.V.,WALKER, N., BIRKINSHAW,C.&YODER, A.D. (2021) Living in tiny fragments: a glimpse at the ecology of Goodman’s mouse lemurs (Microcebus lehilahytsara) in the relic forest of Ankafobe, Central Highlands, Madagascar. Primates, 62, 887–896.


ANDRIANTOMPOHAVANA, R., ZAONARIVELO, J.R., ENGBERG, S.E., RANDRIAMAMPIONONA, R., MCGUIRE, S.M., SHORE, G.D. et al. (2006) Mouse lemurs of northwestern Madagascar with a description of a new species at Lokobe Special Reserve. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 259a, 1–23.


AXEL, A.C. & MAURER, B.A. (2011) Lemurs in a complex landscape: mapping species density in subtropical dry forests of southwestern Madagascar using data at multiple levels. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 38–52.


BESSONE, M., KÜHL, H.S., HOHMANN, G., HERBINGER, I., N’GORAN, K.P.,ASANZI,P.etal. (2023) Assessing the effects of survey-inherent disturbance on primate detectability: recommendations for line transect distance sampling. Primates, 64, 107–121.


BIRKINSHAW, C.R. (1995) The importance of the black lemur, Eulemur macaco (Lemuridae, Primates), for seed dispersal in Lokobe Forest, Madagascar. PhD thesis. University College, London, UK.


BLANCO, M., DOLCH, R., GANZHORN, J., GREENE, L.K., LE PORS, B., LEWIS, R. et al. (2020) Microcebus mamiratra.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2. RLTS.T136206A115581016.en.


BUCKLAND, S.T. (2006) Point-transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies. The Auk, 123, 345–357.


BUCKLAND, S.T., ANDERSON, D.R., BURNHAM, K.P. & LAAKE, J.L. (1993) Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.


BUCKLAND, S.T., ANDERSON, D.R., BURNHAM, K.P., LAAKE, J.L., BORCHERS, D.L. & THOMAS,L.(2001) Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.


BUCKLAND, S.T., ANDERSON, D.R., BURNHAM, K.P., LAAKE, J.L., BORCHERS, D.L. & THOMAS,L.(2004) Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.


Oryx, 2025, 59(1), 109–118 © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324000772


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140