search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
“But, what should happen to a dog if the positive rein-


forcement programming fails? Euthanize the dog or suppress the problem so we can reinforce the behaviors we like?” asks dog trainer Ivan Balabanov. Television personality, author and dog trainer Victoria


Stilwell asks, “Why resort to shock when you can get much better results with methods that motivate a dog to behave well without force and with- out any possibility of physical or emotional damage?” Stilwell has been promot-


ing positive training methods for 20 years. “Positive training is more than just giving dogs treats; rather, it’s a philosophy of teaching dogs without the use of pain, fear or intimi- dation.” Dog trainers do not need


Victoria Stilwell with Rita


science to discover what is already known: dogs have feel- ings and emotions, and dogs


are capable of cognitive processes. “They are deserving of our protection, deserving of


individual dignity, and deserving of respectful treatment,” said Balabanov, a world-champion dog trainer and author who resides in Plant City. Unfortunately, this shared understanding and high regard


for dogs among trainers has not led to shared perspectives about training methods and training tools, but rather (and too often) just the opposite. “The current controversies - over method, approach and


outcomes - have deeply divided dog trainers to a point where we can identify different cultures within the dog training community,” writes Ivan in his book Fundamental Principles of Dog Training. “These divisions don’t just reflect individuals training individual dogs for varying purposes (pet, competition, field and so on). They are collectives; groups of trainers (and sometimes even non-trainers) who hold strong and often oppositional beliefs and values.


Continued g


www.TheNewBarker.com


THE NEW BARKER 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104