search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sector Focus


Legal


Sponsored by: mfg Solicitors


Firms must remain vigilant against age discrimination


Is your premises suitable for your business needs?


Brian Flint, from mfg Solicitors, discusses commercial property planning classifications


The planning class of any commercial property could have a lasting impact on your decision to make the purchase, but changes in planning law can now assist you. For example, a commercial


property classed as A1 is perfect if you wish to run a shop but, aside from temporary permissions for change of use, you will generally need to seek extra permission if you want to run a financial services business (A2), restaurant (A3) or pub (A4). It’s worth bearing in mind


that in some cases it’s now possible to change use from A1 to A2 without the need for further consent. If you buy a pub which has


an A4 classification you should, subject to professional advice, also be able to run a restaurant, although the required planning classification is A3. Equally a takeaway could operate under an A1, A2 or A3 classification without further consent. However always be aware


that noise, plant, extraction fans, ventilation, extended hours and the consequent impact on neighbours all remain key issues in considering change of use and/or breaches of planning classification. If you are in any doubt as to


whether a premises is suitable for your business needs, always discuss with your solicitor, consult your local planning office, an independent chartered surveyor or a planning expert.


If members wish to find out more they can contact Brian on 0121 236 7388 or email brian.flint@mfgsolicitors.com


W: mfgsolicitors.com


Follow us on Twitter through @mfgsolicitors


76 CHAMBERLINK May 2019


A Sutton Coldfield HR expert has warned businesses to be vigilant against age discrimination after an 88-year-old NHS secretary became the oldest person to win a legal case. Sara Abbot from the HR Dept


North Birmingham says that with more of the population working into their later years, the risk of firms facing age discrimination cases is on the rise. The warning comes after


grandmother Eileen Jolly successfully sued the Royal Berkshire Hospital after concerns over her alleged ‘frailty’ and age.


‘Don’t let age come into your assessment of staff or candidates’


After the case, Mrs Jolly told a


national newspaper: “I feel people ought to be allowed to carry on working if they want to and can still do what is required.” Ms Abbot said: “Age discrimination is not just relevant to older staff: younger workers can be discriminated against too. “Discrimination could happen at


any time, but there are some occasions when it’s more likely. “These include during


recruitment, when making training and promotion decisions, managing performance and at retirement. “It’s vital not to make age-based


assumptions which distort decisions. This often leads to poor outcomes all round, such as hiring the wrong people, demotivating


Time sensitive: Don’t assess staff on age. Inset: Sara Abbot


existing employees who see through the prejudice and, of course, discrimination tribunal claims. “It is about mindset and


practical measures. So, don’t let age come into your assessment of staff or candidates. Try forming teams with people of different age groups who are working to common goals – this brings people together. “Facilitate different age groups exchanging skills, knowledge and


ideas. It could be a real benefit to your business. “An age discrimination tribunal


claim could be brought by someone who doesn’t even work for you – based on a job which specified a number of years’ experience. Or as a result of some so-called ‘banter’ from a colleague. “Or because of some shoddy


treatment around a forced retirement. It’s worth reading up on and seeking professional advice if you think you may have an issue.”


New chair of Pensions Board


Squire Patton Boggs’ Pensions partner Helen Miles has been appointed as the chair of the NHS Pensions Board by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. In her new role, Helen (pictured) will be


responsible for ensuring that the pension scheme, which has more than three million members, is compliant with regulations, legislation and the Pensions Regulator’s Code of Practice. She will work with the board to


provide ongoing evaluation of the governance, delivery and monitoring mechanisms of the NHS Pension Scheme. Helen said: “In over 25 years as a legal


adviser to pension schemes, I have worked alongside many trustee boards in managing governance, compliance and member engagement. As part of the firm’s pensions team, I already deal


with many of the largest and most complex private sector schemes in the UK. “The experience I have drawn from my client work


has given me many of the key skills which I will need in this role, and this was recognised in my selection and appointment. “I look forward to bringing that


experience to bear in ensuring the NHS Pension Scheme continues operating to the very highest standards.” Clifford Sims, head of the firm’s


Pensions Practice Group, said: “Helen’s appointment is very well-deserved and testament to her considerable experience, strategic nous and outstanding


communication skills. “We are very proud of Helen and believe that she will be a real asset to the NHS Pensions Board.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92