Air Monitoring - UK Focus v When is a Particle Not a Particle?
In the following article, Jim Mills from Air Monitors explains his answer to this intriguing question. The appearance of particulate matter (PM), like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder, and by that I mean that the results of PM monitoring often depend on what you are measuring with. A wide range of PM monitors are available, so it is important that the monitor fits the task. For this reason, Air Monitors offers a monitor for almost every PM monitoring application, each of which will be discussed briefly below.
Reference / Equivalent Monitoring of PM10 / PM2.5
The TEOM / FDMS continuous ambient particulate monitor measures either PM10 or PM2.5, or both simultaneously in the dichotomous version. Both have MCERTS designation and DEFRA approval for both fractions. The FIDAS 200 also has approval from MCERTS and DEFRA for PM10 and PM2.5 and can measure both simultaneously with the additional capability of TSP, PM4, PM1 and Pn (particle number). Both have their individual merits and the choice will depend on the application, availability of power and the monitoring
The FIDAS 200 is an MCERTS approved Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System
requirements. Indicative PM10, PM2.5, Pn (Particle number) monitoring
Reference PM monitors are relatively expensive, so there is a need to supplement national networks with a higher density of monitors which may be less accurate but still meet the requirements of the specific application. Consequently, lower cost monitors such as AQMesh and TSI’s Environmental Dust Trak have been developed that offer the ability to measure ambient particulates without the capital and operational costs of reference stations. These indicative monitors are also smaller and can be battery or solar powered, which makes them extremely flexible because they can be quickly and simply deployed in areas of greatest interest: in pollution hotspots; close to schools; alongside construction projects and on busy roads. These monitors are particularly useful in Planning situations; providing background data in advance of a project, and then providing
continuous data during and after development work, with live access to web-enabled data and the ability to generate alarms via text and email.
Black Carbon Most PM measurements provide a mass concentration output and thereby assume that all particles are of equal significance. In reality this is not the case because some of the particles are relatively benign from a human health perspective or are not anthropogenic so are of less interest from an air quality management perspective. In addition to its impact on human health, Black Carbon (BC) also has a negative impact on climate change.
Fine particles (from the combustion of fossil fuels) that are of most interest are BC and can be measured with an Aethalometer, which employs an optical method to only measure those fine particles which are black. Importantly, an Aethalometer can provide a real-time readout of the mass concentration of BC and can differentiate between elemental carbon and biomass derived carbon aerosol particles in the air which means that live data can be used to identify the contributions of BC: road traffic, wood burning, cooking etc. BC can also be measured with a portable battery-powered microAethalometer that can be used to determine personal exposure throughout
a typical day. Nano Particles / Ultrafines
From a human health perspective, the particles of most interest are those that penetrate deep into the lungs – the ultrafine or nano particles. Several studies have demonstrated that on a mass-basis, smaller particles appear to be more toxic than larger particles. This can be explained by the much larger surface area of the smaller particles per unit of mass. Particles can also transport adsorbed toxins on their surface, or their surface can act as catalyst inside a cell, creating reactive oxygen species. Measuring the number of these particles is more appropriate than measuring their mass, because while their mass may be very low they may be present in extremely large numbers.
The Naneos Partector measures lung deposited surface area (LDSA). It is the world’s smallest nanoparticle detector and ideal for personal monitoring. The Pegasor Urban uses similar diffusion charging technology and can measure particle number, surface area and mass concentration in one monitor which can be deployed
continuously. Indoor air quality
Globally, many of the deaths that are attributed to air pollution arise from indoor PM. This is because, according to the World Health Organisation, around 3 billion people still cook and heat their homes using solid fuels (i.e. wood, crop wastes, charcoal, coal and dung) in open fires and leaky stoves. Most are poor, and live in low and middle-income countries. Nevertheless, in the UK, viewers of the recent Channel 4 programme may have been surprised to note the high levels of pollution recorded by AQMesh pods during the cooking of an evening meal in a modern English home. Similarly, in February this year Harry Wallop, a Telegraph journalist, borrowed an Air Monitors instrument and discovered that dust levels were much higher in his home than the Telegraph office, and that levels were raised significantly by his wood burner, and raised enormously when he burned his toast.
Harry used a Thermo pDR-1500 personal dust monitor, which compensates for environmental variables and employs nephelometry. The AQMesh PM pods and the Pegasor IAQ units can also provide valuable information about exposure to indoor PM and other pollutants.
In summary, it is important to employ the correct technology for each particulate monitoring application, and care should therefore be taken in the choice of technology and in the interpretation of results. Anyone in
any doubt should consult Air Monitors for guidance.
39690pr@reply-direct.com
For More Info, email: email:
For More Info, email: email:
For More Info, email: email:
For More Info, email: email:
6607ad@reply-direct.com www.envirotech-online.com IET Annual Buyers’ Guide 2016/17
R
e f e
5
e r
. 2
c n
M P
/ e
/
q
E
0 1
v
i
u
M P
e
l
a
t n
t
n
e l a
M
P
v
u i
0
1
E q
/
/ e
M
P
c n
.
2
e r
5
e f e
R e f
5
e r e
. 2
n c
M P
e /
/ 0
E q
M
1
u i
P
v a l
n e
t
e n t
v
a
l
P
u
i
M 1
E
q
0 /
e
/
P
n
c
M 2 .
e
r
e
5
e
f
R e f
5
e r e
M 2 .
n c
P
e /
0 /
E q
M 1
u i
P
v a l e n t
R
R
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136
