search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
16 Air Monitoring


Oxygen Measuring Device for Flue and Process Gases


The oxygen measuring device OMD 14, from Dr. Födisch Umweltmesstechnik AG (Germany), is used for the measurement of the oxygen concentration in flue gases and process gases. Thereby the concentration of the free oxygen is measured.


The oxygen measuring device OMD 14 consists of an in-situ probe and a probe head. The probe is equipped with a regulated sensor heating and electronics for operating and visualisation. The evaluation electronics and the measuring value display are located in the probe head. The centrepiece of the device is a potentiometric zirconium dioxide sensor.


The measuring gas diffuses through the measuring cell of the probe rod. Thereby the oxygen concentration is detected. Thanks to the electronics the analogue sensor signal is converted and is provided on transfer clamps as an mA signal.


The oxygen measurement is carried out by means of a zirconium dioxide cell. Inside the cell the measuring gas is separated from the reference gas (ambient air) via a zirconium membrane. Depending on the oxygen partial pressure the oxygen ions move through the membrane. This results in an electric potential difference.


The used oxygen sensor consists of a measuring cell and a pump cell which provides a constant oxygen concentration in the measuring cell. The thereby spent energy is a degree for the oxygen concentration.


Due to the proven proportionality of the signal to the concentration a steady exactness in all oxygen concentration ranges is ensured. 39705pr@reply-direct.com


Gas Analysis Workshop Focuses on FTIR Versatility


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email: email:


+43 512 214 800 • www.ionicon.com 6656ad@reply-direct.com


Gasmet Technologies (Finland), the manufacturer of FTIR gas analysers, organised a meeting in Lisbon, immediately prior to the CEM 2016 conference and exhibition in May, to provide delegates with an insight into the wide variety of applications for which FTIR technology is employed.


For More Info, email: email:


The measurement of greenhouse gases (GHGs) was a particular focus for the event, with presentations from a number of speakers outlining the advantages of simultaneous


RAW GAS • FLUE GAS • PROCESS


multigas analysis with Gasmet’s fixed and portable FTIR analysers. Dr Joseph Storlien from Saint John’s University, Minnesota USA, described his work with portable Gasmet FTIR analysers in the measurement of soil flux GHGs. He explained how robust field-use instruments such as the DX4040 enable faster, easier collection of monitoring data; delivering more data points than the more costly and time-consuming methods that rely on laboratory analysis.


Dr Storlien summarises his presentation in a short video that can be viewed on the Gasmet YouTube channel. This webpage also features a video demonstrating how to employ portable FTIR for soil gas analysis.


Prior to the Lisbon meeting, Gasmet received notification that its CEMS II e continuous emissions monitoring system had successfully completed EN 15267-3 testing for the analysis of low range Hydrogen Fluoride, low range Nitrous Oxide, Methane and Formaldehyde. “This means that it meets the performance specifications in European directives and also the more stringent specifications in the type approval standard EN 15267-3 for a larger number of components than any other FTIR in this market,” commented Gasmet’s Antti Heikkilä. A brief video explaining the importance of this certification also features on the Gasmet YouTube channel.


The newly certified emissions analyser was the highlight of Gasmet’s booth at CEM 2016, the industrial emissions monitoring conference that also took place in Lisbon. “Focusing as it does on continuous emission monitoring, CEM 2016 could not have been better timed,” says Heikkilä. “The Conference was attended by international delegates from key sectors such as Power Generation and Waste Incineration, so there was enormous interest in the new performance data for our FTIR analysers.”


Gas Monitoring in Tough Areas


Emissions monitoring can be a challenge due to corrosive gases, high dust load, and high temperatures.


Based on a non-contact method, OPSIS provides an accurate analyser that will operate with a minimum of maintenance.


The OPSIS cross-stack system has been tested and approved for the best performance and longest calibration intervals.


Read more about our gas monitoring solutions on our website opsis.se.


For More Info, email: email:


IET Annual Buyers’ Guide 2016/17 www.envirotech-online.com


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email:


Scan the QR code to watch our videos on OPSIS Play, or go directly to opsis.se.


OPSIS AB www.opsis.se


Phone: +46 46 72 25 00 E-mail: info@opsis.se


6608ad@reply-direct.com


For the First Time in Sodar History... ... a wind energy certification campaign has started with


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email: email:


absolutely no post filtering of the data. Moreover, there has even been no preliminary intercomparison period before the official start of the experiment. Remtech (France) brought one PA0 Sodar (belonging to a customer and a few years old) onto the WindGuard test site and simply started it. WindGuard specialists have retrieved the Sodar data and made the statistical intercomparison analysis with their tower data to which Remtech has never had access.


The fact that our instrument is capable of outputting only good data (never any outlier) is fundamental. You can trust the data, and you do not have to spend a lot of time and money trying to “filter” the data after the fact with no assurance regarding the final result. The recovery rate is very high.


This is achieved thanks to: Multiple frequency coded transmission, noise subtraction in the Fourier domain, the “apparent” angle of arrival signal processing, and phase gradient versus frequency.


For More Info, email: email:


39817pr@reply-direct.com 39503pr@reply-direct.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136