This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
HEALTH & SAFETY


THE RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX


CONSEQUENCES


Never heard of in


HELPING YOU MANAGE RISK EFFECTIVELY!


In previous issues, Risktec Solutions has discussed the five basic steps of an effective Risk Management Process [see Figure 1], including how to perform the first step of ‘Hazard Identification’, and introduced the concept of ‘Tolerability of Risk’; the basis for deciding whether a risk is or is not worth taking. In this issue, Risktec continues its series of articles on Risk Management by introducing one of the most widely used tools, the Risk Assessment Matrix [RAM].


STEP 1:


Identify Unwanted Event


STEP 2: Assess Likelihood STEP 3:


Assess Consequences STEP 4:


Evaluate Risk STEP 5:


Manage/Control Risk


Hazard Identification Frequency Analysis


Consequence Analysis Risk Evaluation


Assessment of acceptability


Identification of risk reduction measures


Implementation of risk reduction measures


SHE Management System Steps aided/supported/facilitated/informed by a Risk Assessment Matrix


Figure 1: Elements of an effective Risk Management Process


Risk is the combination of the likelihood that an unwanted event will occur [release of a hazard] and the severity of its consequences. A RAM [see Figure 2 for an example] presents a qualitative means of categorising the likelihood and consequences of an unwanted event along separate axes, allowing the magnitude of the associated risk to be determined and presented in a simple display. It is extremely versatile in that it can aid, support, facilitate and inform all risk management steps other than ‘Hazard Identification’. If implemented correctly it is easy to use.


The RAM should be tailored to reflect the range of likelihoods and consequences covering all credible hazards and should be broken down into logical, clearly defined and unambiguous bands. If using your RAM to cover multiple effects, ensure that each band within each consequence category is consistent. Figure 3 presents an example.


Impact Types Severity


Financial Impact


6 5 4 >100 million


Health & Safety


>10 fatalities or very serious irreversible


injury/illness to >50 persons.


£10 million – £100 million


<10 fatalities or very serious irreversible


injury/illness to >20 persons.


£1 million - £10 million


Single fatality, or significant irreversible


injury/illness to one or more persons.


3


£100,000 - £1 million


Moderate irreversible


injury/illness to one or more persons.


Reversible 2


1 0


£10,000 - £100,000


injury/illness requiring


hospitalisation to one or more persons.


<£10,000 None


No medical treatment required.


None


Minor effects on biological or physical


environment. Limited damage


to minimal area of low significance.


None Natural Environment


Significant impact on highly valued species, habitat or ecosystem.


Very serious, long-term


environmental impairment of ecosystem function.


Serious medium term


environmental effects.


Moderate, short- term effects but not affecting ecosystem function.


Social/Cultural Heritage


Irreparable damage to


structures/items of great cultural significance.


Irreparable damage to structures/items of cultural significance.


Irreparable damage to commonplace


structures/items or major repairable damage to structures/items of cultural significance.


Major repairable damage to commonplace structures/items or


moderate repairable damage to


structures/items of cultural significance.


Moderate repairable


damage to commonplace structures/items or minor repairable damage to structures/items of cultural significance.


Minor repairable damage to commonplace structures.


None


Minor, adverse local public or media attention and complaints.


Public concern


restricted to local complaints.


None Low-level legal issue. None Minor legal issues,


non-compliances and breaches of regulation.


Community, Government, Reputation & Media


International public or media condemnation.


Serious public or


media outcry with international coverage.


Serious adverse


national media/public attention.


Legal Potential jail terms


for executives and/or very high fines for


company. Prolonged, multiple litigation.


Very significant


prosecution and fines. Very serious litigation.


Major breach of


regulation and fines. Major litigation.


Attention from media and/or heightened concern by local community.


Serious breach of regulation with investigation or


report to authority with prosecution


and/or moderate fine possible.


Hazard Identification Risk Analysis


Risk-based Decision Making


Risk Assessment Risk Reduction


Risk Management


Electricity Industry


0 INCREASING LIKELIHOOD


Heard of in Electricity Industry


Incident has occurred in Offshore Wind


Industry None 1 Slight Health Effect/Injury 2 Minor Health Effect/Injury 3 Major Health Effect/Injury 4


Single Fatality


5 Multiple Fatalities None Slight Damage Minor Damage


Localised Damage


Major Damage


Extensive Damage


None Negligible Minor Impact


Moderate Impact


Significant Impact


Severe Impact


None Slight Impact


Limited Impact


Local Impact


National Impact


International Impact


Happens several


times per year in


Offshore Wind


Industry Happens


several times per year on a UK


Offshore Wind Farm


Figure 2: Example Risk Assessment Matrix for Offshore Wind Industry Here are a few helpful tips to allow you to construct and use a RAM effectively.


1 Cover the effects you are worried about Whilst the health and safety of people is always the primary concern, hazards will have other potential effects [e.g. harm to environment, asset damage, business interruption, reputation loss, etc.]. Use your RAM to assess all possible effects by providing separate consequence categories [see Figure 2].


2 Tailor to suit your needs There are no rules as to the size and shape of a RAM. Build it to suit your specific needs. A simple 3x3 matrix is adequate when you need a crude indication of risk. When making more informed decisions, you’ll need the greater resolution offered by a larger matrix [e.g. 5x5].


22


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


SEVERITY People Assets Environment


Reputation


Figure 3: Example ‘user-friendly’ consequence bands


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148