This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Go Back to www.IndependentRetailer.com MANAGEMENT Census Data For Indys


ACCORDING TO data released from the U.S. Economic Census, overall sales at independent retail- ers grew by about four percent, after adjusting for infl ation, be- tween 2002 and 2007. The bad news: chains grew faster and in- dependents still lost market share, falling from 31 to 28 percent of consumer retail spending. This decline in market share, how- ever, was considerably slower in this fi ve year period, compared with the preceding 20 years, in which independents lost ground at a faster rate. In 1982, indepen- dent retailers captured nearly half of all retail spending. The report comes by way of the, “New Rules


Project,” a program of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. The U.S. Economic Census is


conducted every fi ve years. The resulting data are released in batches two to four years later. For this analysis, the New Rules Project defi nes independent retail- ers as those with fewer than 10 outlets. Because the 2007 Census preceded the current recession, the downturn’s impact on both in- dependents and chains will not be evident until the 2012 Census. Here are a few other highlights


from the new data: • Most remarkable has been


the growth of specialty food stores, such as bakeries and greengro-


cers. The Census showed a net gain of over 1,400 small specialty food retailers (those with fewer than 20 employees). Sales at these stores shot up 23 percent even as grocery sales overall grew just three percent. This trend likely refl ects increased public inter- est in locally produced foods, as well as a growing desire to shop at neighborhood stores. • Employees of independent re-


tailers earned more per year than employees of national chains (an average of $27,451 vs. $20,313). Whether this refl ects a higher hourly rate or more hours worked is not discernable from the data.


continued on page 118


114 February 2011


INDEPENDENTRETAILER


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128