This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
May/June, 2012


www.us-tech.com Stencil Printing Challenges for Small Devices Continued from page 54


with nanocoat >0.5 , electroform with nanocoat >0.43. Typical aperture widths as low


as 0.175mm and aperture lengths as low as 0.4mm present a challenge to the printing process as far as percent paste transfer. The other challenge is the solder mask employed on the PCB. There are three types of solder


mask designs which are: l


defined by the solder mask. l


SMD (solder mask defined), where the pad opening on the board is


ically 0.05 to 0.075mm per side). l


NSMD (non solder mask defined), where the pad itself defines the boundary of the pad and the solder mask is pulled back off the pad (typ-


NSMD-Window. In the last case there is no sol-


der mask between the pads so bridg- ing between pads is more likely than with solder mask between pads.


Stencil and PCB Design Table 1 shows stencil design


guidelines for the three solder mask cases. This table shows the package size, the lead pitch, the number of I/Os, the package lead dimensions, the recommended PCB pad dimen- sions, the recommended stencil aper- ture dimension, recommended sten- cil thickness, and resulting area ratio. For NSMD the stencil aperture is 1-1 with the PCB pad dimension. It should be noted that the recommend- ed length of the pad on the PCB com- pared to the length of the lead on the QFN is 0.2mm larger. As seen, the area ratio for a 0.125mm thick sten- cil is >0.66 for all the examples list-


are recommended. The final example in Table 1 is


the NSMD-Window. The pitch is 0.4mm, leaving little room to put sol- der mask between pads on the PCB. Aperture size is also small giving a challenging area ratio for 0.125mm thick stencils; therefore, 0.100mm thick stencils are normally recom- mended to provide a more robust stencil printing process window.


Higher Paste Deposits Another problem arises when


using a NSMD-Window when the solder mask is higher than the pad on the PCB. In this case the solder paste is extruded through the stencil since the stencil is not in contact with the PCB pads during printing. This extruded paste will make con- tact with the bottom side of the sten- cil causing potential bridging during successive prints since there is no solder mask between neighboring pads. Stencil wiping after every print may help reduce this problem.


A special electroform stencil which is 0.08mm


Table 1. Stencil design guideline.


ed. Aperture size for the SMD is 0.05mm smaller than the PCB pad. There are typically two reasons for this reduction. If the stencil is slight- ly misaligned to the PCB, paste could be printed on the solder mask. Also,


there might be high stress points if solder contacts the mask. The reduc- tion in aperture size has reduced the area ratio making paste transfer more difficult. For area ratios below 0.66, electroform or NicAlloy stencils


thick everywhere except in the QFN area inside the solder mask can solve problems of differing solder mask heights.


One possible solution suggested


by a customer is a PCB side step stencil. This is an electroform stencil which is 0.08mm thick everywhere


Continued on next page.


Page 57


See us at AATE Booth 1733


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104