This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
with my rifl es, along with much im- proved handloading, there still were too many unexplained sighting problems, evidenced by the increasing number of shooters coming to my shop for help. At this time I made a more serious effort to fi nd out why some of the scoped rifl es were plainly not remaining sighted. By then I had some pretty so-


phisticated shop and test equipment to measure tolerances and discover rifl e and scope related problems. I later de- signed and built an instrument to test scopes which revealed some frailties surrounding the scope that a shooter ordinarily wouldn’t think of. I even di- sected a few scopes in the process. The results of these fi rst tests culminated in an article published in the January 1992 RIFLE Magazine, titled: “Test Your Rifl e Scope,” and was later voted the win- ner of the 1992 Leica Writing Award. Leica thought the article was especially informative because it dealt with little known and rarely discussed limitations inherent in all rifl escopes. So, as I delved more seriously into


the interrelated scope problems, a paral- lelism was apparent between the scope and its critical internal function with respect to rifl es not remaining sighted- in. Reasons both simple and complex would be studied. LET’S CRAWL EVEN MORE DEEPLY INSIDE THE SCOPE


At this time we will look inside


the typical rifl e scope and cover some of the major issues related to the variable power scope with parallax correction. I have provided some pictures to help in my descriptions of some of these problem-related issues. In the modern-day scope, there are


many moving parts – many of which can cause the scope reticle to be unstable and shift position. The higher the quality of the scope, the closer the tolerance of moving parts is likely to be. However, as the precision machinist would defi ne it, we are still stacking tolerances, which is essentially dealing with the variance permitted in maintaining a specifi c di- mension while assembling parts togeth- er as a unit, and this includes all scopes. There are no specifi c tolerance specifi ca- tions whereby the scope manufacturers must adhere to. The old saw, “You get what you pay for,” does not always hold true either. My ongoing tests revealed problems associated with some higher


cost scopes while other seemingly lower quality scopes came through without a hitch. But the odds do favor the better known brands over the cheaper ones. Yet, how many average hunters and shooters can justify paying almost as much, or more, for a scope and mount- ing system as they would for the rifl e it’s being mounted on. Therefore, you must work with that which you have, along with its limitations, and these subtle nuances must be understood. As we peer closely into a rifle


scope looking for gremlins, let’s fi rst look at the way the crosshairs (reticle) are controlled or adjusted in sighting-in a rifl e. The erector tube, which is es- sentially a scope within a scope, houses a lens cell, including the reticle. The erector tube is pivotally anchored at one end, normally at the rear, aligned with the objective lens at the front, and the ocular lens at the rear. As the eye peers through the scope, the reticle, in its various forms, is in the path of view … essentially superimposed over an otherwise clear view of what we are seeing. Then, from its pivotal anchor point forward, about four inches, the front of the erector tube passes along the side of the scope adjustment turrets. Here it is supported near the end from below by a leaf spring which pushes it triangularly upward against the wind- age and elevation adjustment screws located directly above and at the right side of the turrets. The fi ne adjusting screws are threaded through each tur- ret with external graduated adjusting knobs. Then, as each adjusting knob is rotated clockwise, it puts increased pres- sure on the front or side of the erector lens tube, thereby causing it to move the reticle across the viewing fi eld, as a unit, against the lateral or vertical force of the single leaf spring. This produces both downward and left bullet impact shift on target. Then, as each knob is turned counter clockwise, the thrust spring, from below, causes the erector lens tube to follow the direction of the screws and move bullet point of impact upward and to the right. These adjust- ments are a vulnerable area, common to many scopes for sighting problems. Benchrest shooters readily agree that the scope sight is one of the weakest links in maintaining a high degree of accuracy and reticle stability. ..and these guys are in-the-know.


Here are the comparative results of the lower priced Barska 6.5-20x scope pitted against a much higher rated Nitrex 6-20x scope. These quite remarkable groups were shot at 100 yards with a Model 700 Remington rifle equipped with a Broughton barrel in caliber 270 Winchester using 140-grain Berger bullets. Following the aforementioned scope therapy, groups made with the Barska scope paralleled those of the Nitrex scope. As a further test of the scopes for the 16x groups, the power collar was turned from a lower setting to 16x before each shot. Here I was essentially using the rifl e to test the scopes.


Initially I had selected 18 scopes


for this evaluation, including both variable and fixed power types. But the evaluation process grew to more than 10 times this number over the next two decades. I also had improved my process of evaluating scopes. In the interim, scores of new scopes were being introduced to the marketplace, including a seemingly large number of new companies. You just turn around and a new scope brand enters the mar- ketplace. But as I indicated earlier, the more things changed, the more they seemed to stay the same. The scope still remains our only means of better seeing and hitting on target. Yet, in the area of reticle (erector tube) adjustment stabil- ity, obvious problems continue in far too many scopes, and this includes no small number of those in the mid-to-upper


www.varminthunter.org Page 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212