This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Soft Touch Members Jim Williamson and Mic McPherson


WILLIAMSON’S THOUGHTS A quality pellet gun can be effective on smaller species of


vermin to surprising distances. The combination of signifi cant practice, an accurate gun, and a scope with a usefully busy reticle (something similar to the Leupold Varmint Hunter’s) are necessary for highly successful shots beyond point blank range. Making hits near 100 yards might not be routine but I succeed often enough to make such attempts worthwhile. Spring 2009, John Anderson (our editor) invited me to join


him and Mic McPherson on a Richardson’s ground squirrel hunt. I took along several conventional rifl es, a spring-powered pellet pistol, and my air-powered rifl e. For the pellet rifl e, I took one high-pressure air tank and 1,500 pellets. When fully charged, my air tank will recharge the gun


at least 50 times. Each recharge of the air reservoir in the gun gives about 35 pellet launches at near full velocity (about 830 fps). Therefore, one air tank allows me to fi re more than 1,750 full-power shots. (My special tank will safely hold 4,500 psi, which is signifi cantly more pressure than the average air tank will safely withstand.) In two full days of shooting, I ran out of pellets after mak-


ing more than 700 kills. Most of the targets were Richardson’s ground squirrels. Most were at ranges from about 15 yards to about 40 yards but many were well beyond that distance. The longest measured kill was at about 75 yards. I also took two full-grown black-tailed prairie rats. Each of


those required several well-placed hits. Such a target is asking a bit much of a 22-caliber pellet. Spring 2010, McPherson and I hunted the same area, but


Anderson could not join us. I hunted less with the airgun and more with centerfi re guns. Nevertheless, I took several hundred Richardson’s with pellets. Again, most of those shots were at less than about 40 yards. Pellet guns have signifi cant advantages over any regular


gun. Chiefl y, these are quiet and inexpensive to shoot. Quality pellets cost only a few pennies each and the air, or muscle power, is essentially free. Because of simple convenience, for most folks a modern


quality spring rifl e is probably a better choice than an air rifl e. However, as a retired fi refi ghter, I have several high-pressure air tanks. This changes the balance. For me, the airgun is a bet- ter choice. One persistent problem with scoping an airgun of any type


is that quality scopes that are otherwise ideal will not focus and parallax zero to close enough distances for common shots. I have discussed this situation with several manufacturers. So far, the demand just has not been suffi cient. Perhaps that will change. A signifi cant advantage of hunting such vermin with a


pellet rifl e is that landowners tend to have an entirely different perspective about such guns, compared with any conventional gun. Lack of noise is one obvious reason. What they cannot hear will not bother them. On one farm, the landowner allowed me to hunt all around the house while she was home. Mic had a Hornet and Barnes Varmint Grenade loads that are far safer against ricochets, even when compared with a


Williamson with kill and supplies: Gun, pellets (in pouch), binocular, and air tank. He stages the tank in a central location so that getting a refi ll does not require much of a walk. He also carries extra pellets in a can in a pocket. The barrel extension improves accuracy.


simple BB gun, but you can bet that he never would have gotten permission to do such hunting, even if she had not been home. Perception matters.


MCPHERSON’S COMMENTS I was amazed at the amount of entertainment Williamson


achieved with his pellet gun. I know that he eradicates thousands of vermin annually for friends and neighbors who live within a few tens of miles of his home in southern California but it was enlightening to observe what a serious marksman could do with such a gun. I took several dozen shots – enough to learn that hunting


Richardson’s with an airgun is perfectly feasible; and, enough to learn that I would need considerable practice to approach Williamson’s level of expertise. I am interested. However, I do not need another hobby. So,


for now, I will stick to primers and nitro compounds to power my shooting fun. One reality of pellet-gun hunting is that most shots do not


result in instant kills. This might bother some folks. However, regardless of gun used, wounded vermin are part of the reality of what we do. Nothing is perfect. One compensation, as Jim has noted, is that he can hunt with a pellet rifl e without disturbing anyone and without signifi cant expense or concern about rico- chets ranging beyond about 200 yards (even under the worst of circumstances).


www.varminthunter.org Page 133


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212