review research
Quaternary barrier cuts droop in UV LEDs InAlGaN barrier boosts ultra-violet LED output at high current densities
BY SWITCHING the barrier in an ultra- violet LED from AlGaN to InAlGaN, a Taiwanese team has reduced droop, which is the decline in device efficiency at higher drive currents.
The engineers arrived at this conclusion after fabricating a conventional 1 mm by 1 mm, 380 nm LED with an AlGaN barrier and a variant that only differed in the composition of the barrier, which was switched to InAlGaN. The conventional design suffered from a 34 percent decline in efficiency as current was cranked up from 350 mA to 1000 mA, compared to just 13 percent for the variant with the quaternary barrier.
The superior barrier developed by researchers from National Chiao-Tung University, National Chung Hsing University and Advanced Optoelectronic Technology could help to increase the efficiency of ultra-violet LEDs to a level where they are attractive candidates for air conditioning.
LED epistructures were deposited on
LED structures were produced on a Taiyo Nippon Sanso SR-4000 tool that has a capacity of three 2-inch wafers
sapphire in a Taiyo Nippon Sanso SR- 4000 MOCVD reactor. These structures featured a ten-period multi-quantum well, which is a typical active region for this class of device, according to lead author Po-Min Tu from National Chiao- Tung University: “Because efficiency decreases drastically under the low indium composition [needed to make ultra-violet LEDs], more quantum wells are needed to obtain better recombination rates.”
The active region of the control sample comprised 2.6 nm-thick In0.025
Ga0.975 Ga0.92 combating structure, In0.0085
N barriers. In the droop- Al0.112
N
wells and 11.7 nm-thick, silicon-doped Al0.08
Ga0.8803 N
replaced the ternary barrier. To determine the precise composition of the wells and barriers in both structures, the researchers employed the combination of Bede D1 double-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements and simulations using dynamical diffraction theory.
After processing epiwafers into mesa- type chips that were packaged in epoxy- free metal cans, the researchers drove
Cross-sectional TEM images reveal that the switch from an AlGaN barrier (top) to one made from AlInGaN (bottom) does not have an impact on crystal quality
their devices with 100 µs pulses at a 1 percent duty cycle to prevent self- heating. The device with the quaternary barrier produced a light output power 25 percent and 55 percent higher than the control at drive currents of 350 mA and 1000 mA, respectively. To understand the superior performance of the LED
with the InAlGaN barrier, the researchers modelled both device architectures with Crosslight’s APSYS software. The team obtained a good fit to the experimental data when they assumed that the structure with quaternary barriers produced deeper wells for the electrons and shallower ones for the holes – for the control LED and its variant with the quaternary barrier, the team used band- offset ratios of 6:4 and 7:3, respectively.
Modelling of both LED structures revealed that the reasons behind the superior performance of the device with a quaternary barrier were an increase in 26 and 35 percent in electron and hole concentrations in the quantum wells, and a wider distribution of carriers across the active region.
Tu claims that the primary culprit for droop in these ultra-violet LEDs is poor hole distribution. And he believes that at current densities below 100 A/cm2
,
Auger recombination – a non-radiative process involving three carriers – is not a major contributor to droop.
The next goal for the team is to apply their quaternary barriers to LEDs emitting at around 365 nm, a wavelength that is suitable for UV curing applications.
P.-M. Tu et. al. (2011) Appl. Phys Lett. 98 211107
July 2011
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104