This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS Load relaxation


and anchor testing By Mark Salmon, Independent Fixings Consultants


In his last article, published in issue 67 of Fastener + Fixing Magazine in January, Mark Salmon outlined the relationship between tightening torque and clamping force and introduced the idea of “Load relaxation”. In this article he follows this up by explaining how this can affect anchor testing in general, why it’s particularly significant when testing resin anchors and why it should be born in mind when selling them.


in the anchor bolt, and hence the clamping force through the fixture, to relax. In issue 67 I showed the stresses around the expansion point of an expansion anchor. The diagrams below are my attempt to show the stresses in the base material parallel with the bond of a resin anchor plus the stresses in the resin bond itself which also relax.


L


oad relaxation – for those of you who may have missed issue 67 - is the phenomenon whereby stresses induced into the base material around the fixing gradually dissipate further into the material causing the tension


When we test fixings on site this may or may not be


Immediately after tightening – high stress around the fixing and in the resin, high tension in bolt and clamping force through fixture.


apparent. With fixings which have been tightened down we should experience no load relaxation until we have exceeded the clamping force introduced by tightening. Yes, the clamping force will be in the process of relaxing but until it relaxes to below the test load we won’t notice it. But with fixings where we have not clamped down a fixture, or a test adaptor simulating a fixture, e.g. a resin stud with no fixture applied, we may see load relaxation because all the stresses in the base material and in the resin will have been introduced by the test load and will start to relax immediately they are applied. This relaxation is seen as a small drop off in the load reading. With most fixings all we need to do when this happens is to return the load to the original figure and the subsequent relaxation will usually then be hardly apparent. But it can cause doubt in the mind of some observers, the natural reaction being “The fixing must be failing.” One recent development which emphasises this is the introduction of digital readouts on some testing equipment. We get to a load and instead of it holding steady the load is seen to be clicking back giving the appearance of a failure. Somehow with hydraulic gauges the slight reduction in load is more readily accepted. The problem we get with resin anchors in this regard is to do


with the way they fail and to understand that we need to go back to the way they work. Essentially what we do when we install a resin anchor is to


After relaxation – stresses dissipate into material and within resin, tension in bolt and clamping force through fixture both reduce.


80 Fastener + Fixing Magazine • Issue 69 May 2011


drill a hole, usually using a hammer drilling machine, part fill that with resin so that once the anchor is inserted it will be fully encased in the resin which, when cured, is very hard indeed. This hard material forms very strong interlocks between the rough shapes of the anchor on one side and the surface of the hole on the other. We can see the “roughness” of the anchor as it will usually be either the thread of an anchor rod, the knurling of an internally threaded socket or the deformed shape of reinforcing bar. But the characteristics of the hole sides are harder to appreciate. There are two aspects to this. The first is easy – the roughness of the hole sides. This roughness is generated on an almost microscopic level by the hammering action of the drill bit. It may not feel rough but it is rough enough for the resin to form a very useful interlock.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148