search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PACKAGING WEIGHT DEBATE


THE BIG BEAUTY WEIGHT DEBATE


When it comes to packaging, is it more environmentally friendly to be featherweight, or durable and reusable? Or is the answer a marriage of both? Asks Julia Wray


T


he beauty industry is adopting an increasingly circular approach to its packaging, based around a reduce, reuse and recycle model. And while an interplay of all three elements is optimal, there is debate as to which mix of approaches suit which brands and products best. To dig deep into the benefits and limitations of lightweight ‘reduced’ packaging and ‘reusable’ options, which must crucially offer integrity, something often (but not always) going hand-in-hand with a heavier weight, Cosmetics Business asked industry experts to weigh in on the subject.


DEFINING LIGHTWEIGHTING First up, what exactly is lightweighting? For


26 June 2023


Benjamin Punchard, Mintel’s Global Packaging Insights Director: “Very simply put, lightweighting is making packaging with less material. “For a flexible pack, such as a pouch, this might be achieved by using a thinner film. For a rigid pack type, such as a bottle, it might require some shape redesign in order to maintain the same product volume and rigidity.”


Jesús Beneyto, Deputy General Manager at Faca Packaging, says his customers in the beauty sector ask for lightweighting in two ways: via an eco-design approach and/or a material switch. Eco-design, he says, is “the concept of designing with lower resources” and encompasses Faca’s jars developed with very thin walls and with all components – jars, lids and refills – engineered to


cosmeticsbusiness.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60