geologists were hired to project the sedimentary rock layers outcropping on the surface of the ground back into the subsurface to map traps that could hold oil. Later, the seismic method was developed to detect these traps in the subsurface.
1.2.2 The Cantarell Story
Oil fields have even sometimes been found by accident. Out in his little fishing boat in the Campeche Sound one day in 1961, roughly 100 km off the small Mexican town of Ciudad del Carmen at the western edge of the Yucatán peninsula, the fisherman Rudesindo Cantarell Jiménez saw something shiny floating on the sea surface. It was oil stains. Initially, he believed the slicks came from leaks spilling from ships passing through the area, but the oil continued reappearing. What he had discovered were natural seeps rising to the surface through 40m of sea water from the oil-filled formations beneath. In 1968, when he visited the city of Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, to sell huachinango (red snapper), he told the state-owned oil company Petróleos Mexicanos, or Pemex, about his findings. Tey did not react immediately, but three years later, in 1971, samples were taken and analysed, leading to the discovery of the supergiant oilfield Cantarell, named after the finder. Pemex began producing oil at Cantarell in 1979, and at its peak, in 2004, it produced 2.1 MMbopd. But the story does not end here. Following
the Cantarell discovery, Pemex started an oil exploration programme, including geophysical surveys in south-eastern Mexico, which yielded surprising results. In 1978 a consultant geophysicist with Pemex, Glen Penfield, set out to acquire an airborne magnetic survey of the Gulf of Mexico north of the Yucatán peninsula. Te magnetometer measures the magnetic field of the rocks in order to map out their composition beneath the surface and thus determine the likelihood of finding oil. In the data, however, he observed a huge underwater arc with extraordinary symmetry in a ring 70 km across. Tis observation was inconsistent with what he knew about the region’s geology. Feeling curious, he looked into old gravity data acquired in the 1960s where he found another arc on the peninsula itself. Comparing the magnetic and gravity maps, he saw that the separate arcs neatly formed a circle, 180 km wide, centred near the village of Chicxulub (pronounced cheek-shoe-lube). Together with Pemex geologist Antonio Camargo-Zanoguera they concluded that the huge ring, half on land, half under the Gulf of Mexico, must be an impact crater. Tey felt certain that the ring shape had been created by a cataclysmic event in geological history, such as a meteorite hitting the earth. Te two Pemex geoscientists were allowed to present their
findings at the 1981 conference of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Teir talk attracted scant attention, and the ‘exciting news’ of an impact crater that could be the clue to
Figure 1.13a: Gravity map revealing the Chicxulub crater, which formed 65 million years ago in one of the largest collisions in the inner solar system to have occurred in the last four billion years. The crater is believed to be a multi-ring basin with an outer ring about 300 km in diameter (the black circle outlines the ~180-kilometre diameter crater). The colours represent variations in the magnitude of the gravity field at sea level. Positive gravity anomalies (blue is maximum) indicate dense rocks created by melting of the crust, forming a thick pool of impact melt that eventually solidified into a dense mass of igneous rock. Negative gravity anomalies (lower than normal gravity; red) indicate that the near- surface crustal rocks created by impact-generated shattering of the rock have relatively low densities. The Chicxulub basin appears as a circular region in which gravity values are usually lower than the regional values. Observe the ring-like variations in the gravity field. The irregular black line marks the shoreline of the Yucatán peninsula, and the straight lines mark province borders. The original petroleum exploration borehole locations (C1, S1, and Y6) are shown where a drill core was recovered. That core was sufficient to prove the crater had an impact origin. A scientific borehole Yax-1 was drilled in 2001-2002 and produced continuous rock core sequence through the impact melt-bearing rocks in the crater. A borehole was drilled at sea (Chicx-03A) in 2016.
the great mass extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous received little notice. Although they had a lot of geophysical data to present, they had no rock cores or other physical evidence of a meteor impact, so they reluctantly went back to their Pemex work. However, a Houston Chronicle reporter who was present at
the convention put a story on the front page of the paper on New Year’s Eve, 1981 and he kept telling the story to whoever might listen. Finally, one day in 1990, at a science meeting in Houston, a graduate geology student, Alan Hildebrand, did listen. He had published on arth impact theories and was searching for candidate craters, so he contacted Penfield, who was able to find drill samples from old Pemex wells in the area. Hildebrand analysed the samples, which clearly showed shock-metamorphic materials, providing the first proof that Chicxulub crater in the Yucatán peninsula was the impact site for a 10–15 km diameter meteorite which hit Earth 65 million years ago, at the end of the Mesozoic Era. We now know that when the huge Chicxulub meteoroid
collided with the earth, a massive crater 300 km wide and many kilometres deep was formed. Te explosion was equal to that caused by 100 million megatons of TNT, producing shock waves with a pressure of 660 gigapascals – a pressure greater
9
David A. Kring
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284 |
Page 285 |
Page 286 |
Page 287 |
Page 288 |
Page 289 |
Page 290 |
Page 291 |
Page 292 |
Page 293 |
Page 294 |
Page 295 |
Page 296 |
Page 297 |
Page 298 |
Page 299 |
Page 300 |
Page 301 |
Page 302 |
Page 303 |
Page 304 |
Page 305 |
Page 306 |
Page 307 |
Page 308 |
Page 309 |
Page 310 |
Page 311 |
Page 312 |
Page 313 |
Page 314 |
Page 315 |
Page 316 |
Page 317 |
Page 318 |
Page 319 |
Page 320 |
Page 321 |
Page 322 |
Page 323 |
Page 324 |
Page 325 |
Page 326 |
Page 327 |
Page 328 |
Page 329 |
Page 330 |
Page 331 |
Page 332 |
Page 333 |
Page 334 |
Page 335 |
Page 336 |
Page 337 |
Page 338 |
Page 339 |
Page 340 |
Page 341 |
Page 342 |
Page 343 |
Page 344 |
Page 345 |
Page 346 |
Page 347 |
Page 348 |
Page 349 |
Page 350 |
Page 351 |
Page 352