search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STABILISATION


SKF MARINE With over six decades of experience in stabilizing all kind of vessels, SKF understand customer expectations in terms of product reliability, high quality service and knowledge. The latest full-on service package ensures the system is always up to date, regular visits from SKF staff keeps the system in perfect shape. In-house engineering and preparation ensure not only a smooth service and maintenance regime, but also for retrofit of stabilizer systems and stern tube solutions. A team of experts ensure superb design, in-house fabrication leading to short delivery times. In case of vibration problems, SKF offers condition monitoring of any bearings in question.


For more details email yacht.marine@skf.com


or visit www.skf-yacht.com


and easy to locate electric direct-drive motor, at speeds above 12 knots the roll-damping effect becomes negligible, and the product sensibly retracts.


Last of all, DMS Universal is an up-to-date operating system that can be swopped in place of a malfunctioning, or parts-redundant control box, to prolong and extend the working life of fins and actuators and so forth, as opposed to scrapping and replacing expensive hardware that otherwise had nothing wrong with it in the first place. The potential for cost-saving here is huge, and I think DMS Holland should be commended for having this kind of money-saving attitude.


But with all that’s been said about alternative stabilisation technology, it’s gyros that have been around the longest and the technology shows little sign of plateauing anytime soon. Credit where credit is due I say.


Early criticism from competitors levelled at the cost, the size and general inconvenience of gyros taking up large amounts of space inside a hull, have largely diminished. Manufacturers have bounced back with a vengeance, with new gyro systems that are not only smaller, but are quicker, easier and less expensive to maintain.


Based in La Spezia, Italy, take Smartgyro, for instance, who’s modular gyro units can be serviced, maintained and assembled directly inside the boat.


Incorporating the sphere with flywheel and base frame negates the need for the gyro to be shipped back to the factory for servicing. Seamless installation and onboard maintenance mean vessel downtime is reduced. New design opportunities are created for builders, and there is increased potential for installation in vessels with small or restricted access spaces.


The range includes systems for a variety of vessels in the 30 to 80ft range. With further units under development, the SG series now consists of the SG20 (45 to 55ft), SG40 (50 to 60ft), SG60 (55 to 65ft) and SG80 (over 60ft). Average power


consumption is said to be considerably lower than for competitor units, suggesting that other products might require a larger generator for the same level of roll-reduction.


Even down to the smallest detail, such as having entirely recyclable cardboard packaging and reusable wooden crates, it’s clear that efficiency and sustainability are key considerations for Smartgyro and I commend any company with that kind of positive attitude. With a six-model gyro range aimed squarely at yachts and megayachts in the 20m plus category, VEEM Marine from Australia has focussed on making it as easy as possible for customers, from all over the world, to buy their product.


What exactly do I mean by that? Well, even though these are large and complex products, VEEM Marine are still able to offer a lot of product ‘off the shelf’ and ex stock.


Brett Silich, Global Commercial Manager, told us “Clients can purchase our product often with very short lead times for refit projects, and we saw this became a real selling point last year, for owners having quickly made a decision they would like stabilisation onboard. Depending upon the installation method, docking the vessel is not always essential and often this type of installation can be done alongside the quay.”


Brett is convinced that in the often heated debate over ‘gyros versus fins’, the stabilisation of a vessel at rest (when owners desire the best performance for using toys, for swimming, diving and even for pilots trying to land or take off in helicopters), is superior with the correctly paired gyro(s), over all other stabilisation means.


Brett feels gyros offer greater options for designers and naval architects, in particular with the trend for explorer-style yachts, transiting areas with the potential for ice, that otherwise would not be suitable cruising ground for external appendages, such as fins. “Gyros are completely contained within the hull,” says Brett, “and for environmentally conscious owners pursuing DNV Silent or RINA Dolphin underwater noise classifications, gyros have lower noise and vibration levels inside and out.”


ONBOARD | WINTER 2022 | 117


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204