search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
 














Stateside


Sharon Harris looks at the Responsible Gaming Collaborative’s recent conclusions and asks questions


T


his election year, voters can expect politicians to make promise after promise. Many already have and will continually offer unrealistic, expensive platitudes that sound great. Other more reasonable and doable


commitments may actually happen if these politicians actually act on their campaign pledges. That’s the problem. So often, once politicians turned legislators gain influence over new tax revenue, they often apply it to their own pet projects. Have you ever noticed that many organizations, including religious institutions, have “discretionary funds?” These quiet accounts give leaders great leeway on how, when and where they spend this money.


While many people do, I never donate, or agree to send other resources to a “discretionary fund.” Why would I assign the authority and decision-making to a stranger or someone with a potentially different perspective from mine on a key issue? To me, “group think” is usually problematic and


erodes transparency. The answer is to earmark funds to specific issues or causes and then expect the correct payment. However, even that can fail and the money is either wasted, lost or misspent. After almost every natural and manmade disaster, or


government failure, there is a rush to contribute to help. Way too often, we learn that portions of those resources never reached the pockets of the needy, but somehow line the pockets of the powerful. Sometimes, a few political leaders have rightfully gone down when discovered.


10 FEBRUARY 2020 RESPONSIBLE GAMING COLLABORATIVE


With that backdrop in mind, I found the conclusions of the Responsible Gaming Collaborative (RG) fascinating. This advocacy organization was established in 2018 to develop new programs that address responsible gambling issues and serve as a watchdog over government programs. The RG is affiliated with numerous gaming/ business trade associations, medical colleges, responsible gaming groups and peripheral lottery/racing participants. The RG and the American Gaming Association (AGA)


just released the 2020 analysis and research. The RG analyzed government’s changing attitudes towards dedicating a specific percentage of gaming taxes to fund RG treatment and prevention programs. It has revealed other interesting facts: • The American casino industry generates almost $10 billion in state governmental tax revenues. That money is partially earmarked for advancing responsible gaming efforts and preventing problem gambling.


• While many do, not all states spend these tax funds as promised. This additional funding should complement the hundreds of millions voluntarily distributed by the gaming industry.


• The RG and the AGA advocate that state legislators only use the gaming taxes for their intended purposes – as described by the Responsible Gambling Effectiveness Principles – and not for unknown projects. Here is my question…if not totally financing problem gambling help and education, where does this money go? It depends on the state. Some state legislation provides that gaming taxes fund education, senior prescription medications, tourism or


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126