search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BOJOKO T


he success of regulated and licensed online casino in Sweden has caught the eye of neighbouring Finland where discussions continue to be had around ending its gambling monopoly.


Just as the Swedish market used to be dominated by Svenskaww Spel, in Finland state-owned operator Veikkaus rules supreme over the country’s gambling market.


But just as was the case in Sweden, it is better to not enforce a monopoly and instead allow players to wager at a range of different sites that are licensed and reputable. Ultimately the state-run monopoly approach to online gambling does not  country of additional tax income, jobs and other 


Below, I discuss the current state of play in Finland and why I believe the calls for ending the monopoly and embracing regulation and licensing should be answered.


Why it is time for Finland to end its online


gambling monopoly


Joonas Karhu, Chief Business  the advantages of the Finnish government opening up its online gambling market to other licensed operators.


THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY: Gambling in Finland is currently controlled by


Veikkaus, including land-based and online play for casino, poker, lottery, keno and sports betting. Land-based gambling takes place at casinos, betting shops, kiosks, pubs, petrol stations and other venues while online gambling takes place via 


Players in Finland can legally wager at any online casino they chose, so long as that operator accepts players from the country. This approach is ultimately bad for players and bad for Finland. There is not guarantee consumers are playing at  tax revenues amongst other things.


WHY FINLAND SHOULD EMBRACE ONLINE GAMBLING REGULATION AND LICENSING:


The main reason why Finland should end its online gambling monopoly and regulated and license the sector is so the government can ensure players are properly protected.


At present, they can wager anywhere online and there is absolutely no guarantee the operator offers things like fund protection and tools to help them stay in control of their play. By opening the market up to outside operators but requiring them to obtain a licence, the Finnish regulator can ensure online gambling organisations meet the highest possible standards.


In Sweden, for example, we have seen some of


the largest and most respected online gambling brands enter the market. I’m talking about operators like PlayOJO, 888casino, Casumo, LeoVegas, Mr Green and Videoslots all of which go to great lengths to protect and support their players. In addition to this, the Finnish government could boost its tax coffers with revenues from online casino activity which would likely run into the tens of millions of Euros per year. Some have suggested that opening up the market will take revenues away from Veikkaus and the good causes it supports, but in reality, I believe this won’t be the case. Regulating the market and allowing more operators to participate will bring players that access other online gambling sites to those that are vetted and licensed by the regulator. A thriving online gambling industry will create infrastructure and jobs in Finland. Operators and suppliers will want to set up shop in the country, bringing investment and employment with them. These are all tremendous upsides that at present Finland and Finnish online gambling players are not able to take advantage of.


LESSONS LEARNED IN SWEDEN: If the Finnish government does decide to take


steps towards regulating and licensing its online gambling sector, looking to Sweden for a workable blueprint is not a bad idea at all. Sweden has done a great job of opening its doors to new operators while also ensuring players are protected to the highest possible level.


That said, there has been some confusion around how operators can market to players, which in turn has seen some big-name brands  around not being able to provide players on-going incentives after the initial welcome bonus they are permitted to offer. Those that have offered loyalty schemes, tournaments and other things that encourage players to keep wagering have found themselves under scrutiny.


Of course, Finland might not take the same approach – in the highly regulated UK market operators can offer on-going promotions – so it is more about making regulations clear for operators. While there is always room for interpretation, clear and concise rules of engagement ultimately make operating in the market easier for all concerned.


For me, ending the Veikkaus monopoly and regulating and licensing online gambling in Finland is a no brainer and as discussions continue, I don’t think I am the only one to hold this view.


GIO FEBRUARY 2020 103


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126