search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STRATEGY AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS


Organizational capacity and profit shifting


DANIELA SCUR ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management


Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University


Journal of Public Economics, 238, October 2024 LINK TO PAPER


Co-authors • Daniela Scur


Assistant Professor, Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics


and Management, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University • Katarzyna Bilicka, Huntsman School of Business, Utah State University


Summary While productivity is clearly enhanced by sound managerial practices, profit-


ability measures such as return on assets can be clouded by strategic report- ing and accounting tactics. Te authors examine the relationship between good management practices and multinational enterprises’ (MNEs’) ability to engage in tax avoidance strategies, expanding on a well-established body of research linking effective management to higher productivity.


Prior research has mainly focused on the role of headquarters-level deci- sion-makers in driving aggressive accounting behavior. However, the authors argue that the capacity of local subsidiaries to carry out these strategies is equally critical and has been underexplored. By examining the interaction be- tween management quality and profit shifting, the study shifts attention to the active role that subsidiary-level organizational structures play in facilitating or hindering tax-motivated decision-making. Teir findings reveal that subsid- iaries with stronger organizational capacity report significantly lower profits when located in high-tax countries—suggesting a capacity to shift profits away from such jurisdictions. Tis behavior is not observed in low-tax settings, and the responsiveness to changes in tax rates is concentrated among firms with high-quality management. Te study concludes that while good management enhances productivity, it may also be instrumental in enabling legal but ag- gressive tax avoidance strategies, raising important implications for tax policy and corporate governance.


CONTENTS TO MAIN


| RESEARCH WITH IMPACT: CORNELL SC JOHNSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS • 2024 EDITION


62


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85