search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATIONS


Falling Fortunes: Te Contingent and Asymmetric Effect of Rankings on


WYATT LEE ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration


Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University


Author • Wyatt Lee


Assistant Professor, Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University Summary


Today, virtually all types of organizations are ranked: firms are ranked on sales, hospitals on the treatment of patients, universities on research and teaching, and schools on student performance. Teir use has proliferated in recent decades with the rise of an evaluative culture in which methods and principles of quantification are applied to the governance of organizations and people. Accordingly, many organizations devote considerable time and resources to maintaining a favorable position in rankings, and organization- al scholars have recognized this. A common theme in the literature is that changes in rank affect organizational outcomes, but accumulating evidence indicates that this is not always so.


In this paper, Wyatt Lee calls into question the power of rankings. Instead of asking whether rankings matter, he adopts a contingency approach and inves- tigates when rankings matter. Lee examines the contextual and organizational factors that shape the salience and information value of shifts in rankings: the direction of the change, the availability of information from other intermedi- aries, the sophistication of the audience, and the focal organization’s previ- ous ranking position. Tis theory is supported by panel data analysis and a natural experiment focused on the Fortune 500 rankings. Tis article provides a framework to help scholars understand the contingent and asymmetric consequences of rankings on organizational outcomes, with implications for research on evaluation systems.


Organizational Outcomes Administrative Science Quarterly, 69, 4, December 2024 LINK TO PAPER


CONTENTS TO MAIN


| RESEARCH WITH IMPACT: CORNELL SC JOHNSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS • 2024 EDITION


32


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85