search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
APPLIED ECONOMICS AND POLICY


Te Imitation Game: How Encouraging Renegotiation


Makes Good Borrowers Bad Review of Financial Studies, 37, 12, December 2024


SEAN FLYNN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration


Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University


Co-authors • Sean Flynn, Assistant Professor, Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel


• Alexei Tchistyi


Administration, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University Associate Professor, Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of


Hotel Administration, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University • Andra Ghent, Eccles School of Business, University of Utah


Summary Principal modifications for distressed real estate loans may be preferable to


foreclosures in some instances because of deadweight foreclosure costs. How- ever, principal modifications may also increase the risk of borrowers on other loans strategically defaulting in an attempt to extract similar modifications.


ALEXEI TCHISTYI ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR


Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration


Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University


In this study, the authors show that commercial mortgage borrowers behave opportunistically to attempt to obtain principal reductions. Tey develp a model in which lenders cannot perfectly observe borrowers’ use values and renegotiation is costly, and then exploit a tax rule change that redued the cost of renegotiation. Consistent with the model predictions, borrowers with high private use values of the property are more likely to transfer into special ser- vicing when lenders have a higher capacity to negotiate principal reductions after the rule change. Tese results suggest adverse consequences of principal forgiveness for lenders.


For borrowers to be able to behave opportunistically to the disadvantage of lenders, there must be asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders such that financially healthy borrowers can imitate unhealthy ones; lenders must not be able to observe borrowers’ true willingness and ability to pay.


LINK TO PAPER LINK TO SEAN FLYNN VIDEO


CONTENTS TO MAIN


| RESEARCH WITH IMPACT: CORNELL SC JOHNSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS • 2024 EDITION


14


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85