STRATEGY AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS
Additive vs. subtractive earning in shared human-robot work environments
ORI HEFFETZ PROFESSOR
Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 217, January 2024 LINK TO PAPER LINK TO ORI HEFFETZ VIDEO
Co-authors • Ori Heffetz
Professor, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University
• Bnaya Dreyfuss, Harvard University, Massachusetts • Guy Hoffman, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University
• Guy Ishai, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel • Alap Kshirsagar, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University
Summary Te performance of robots working alongside humans might positively or neg-
atively affect human earnings, depending on the economic setting. In a new real-effort lab experiment, the authors study the impact on human workers’ ef- fort and attitudes as they relate to the economic conditions in their human-ro- bot hybrid workplaces. A previous subtractive-earnings experiment showed that subjects’ expected earnings negatively depend on a robot’s performance, while in this new additive-earnings experiment, they depend on the robot’s performance positively.
Both experiments are guided by a past human-human experiment and by a model of expectations-based reference-dependent preferences. As the theory predicts and as previously found, increasing robot performance discourages effort under subtractive earnings—but the authors predict and find that this effect disappears and perhaps reverses under additive earnings. Additionally, increasing robot performance negatively affects subjects’ perceptions of them- selves and of their robotic coworker under subtractive earnings, but they find that these effects weaken or reverse under additive earnings. Tese findings suggest a relationship between workers’ earning structures and robots’ perfor- mance that should be considered when designing hybrid workplaces.
CONTENTS TO MAIN | RESEARCH WITH IMPACT: CORNELL SC JOHNSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS • 2024 EDITION 57
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85