Difficult to structure


In practice, the proposal comes up against major structural difficulties. France has over a million sailing boats, the majority of which are transportable sailboats and small motorboats, often parked in secondary ports, on trailers or in poorly served areas. Setting up efficient inspection logistics would require the creation of a dense network of authorized technicians capable of covering the entire coastline, rivers and lakes. This challenge goes hand in


hand with an economic issue: for many small boaters, the cost of an inspection could quickly prove to be a deterrent, particularly for older boats with a low residual value.


These difficulties are compounded by the relatively low accident rate in the sector. Available statistics show that serious incidents are rare in proportion to the number of boats on the water. This fact puts the brakes on any attempt at regulation, which is perceived as too restrictive, or even pointless, for most users.


An incentive-based transition strategy


Faced with these limitations, authorities and professional bodies are now moving towards a more pragmatic approach. Rather than imposing mandatory inspections, efforts are focusing on raising awareness of preventive maintenance. Annual campaigns, run by the maritime affairs department in particular, remind boaters of good maintenance practices, especially before the navigation season. In terms of regulations, the French government carries out spot checks in the field, at sea or in port, to verify the conformity of safety equipment. Professional vessels, meanwhile, remain subject to an inspection regime overseen by ship safety centers or third-party organizations such as Bureau Veritas.


More targeted alternatives are also under consideration. Some proposals call for mandatory inspections only on the sale of second-hand boats, or for vessels over a certain age. Others focus on the growing use of digital tools to enhance traceability and vessel maintenance. A number of platforms already offer assisted technical management, inspired by CMMS tools, to keep track of equipment maintenance and regulatory deadlines.


European regulations still not very restrictive


At European level, Directive 2013/53/ EU sets out the essential safety requirements for the marketing of pleasure craft. In particular, it requires CE marking for new units but makes no provision for periodic technical inspections. For the time being, this legal vacuum limits the ambitions of a stricter framework, unless specific national regulations are developed, which France has not yet done.


94 | ISSUE 113 | SEP 2025 | THE REPORT


A question still unanswered


The introduction of a technical inspection for pleasure craft remains a distant prospect. Although the safety and environmental issues are well identified, the logistical, economic and political obstacles currently seem to outweigh the expected benefits. The industry is still waiting for a consensus, which could emerge from local experimentation, voluntary certification initiatives, or the rise of digital management tools. In the meantime, the emphasis is on individual responsibility on the part of owners, and on increasing the skills of the professionals who support them.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136