search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Together, they came up with the technology they call ‘5D printing’. Not only the robot arm that moves the printing nozzle to the position where it needs to add material is moving in this technique, also the table on which the product-in-progress is sitting moves to position the work in a way that the weld between one layer of material and the next will be such that the strength of this weld will be most beneficial to add strength to the structure. The result, ready for production since 2022, is a 5.2 meters long launch with 2.1 meter beam. The bare hull has a displacement of only 350 kilograms. The builders point out that any dimensions can be easily adapted, because 3D printing allows for endless customisation. The printer creates the boats one-by-one and any time a print is run, the design can be altered.


HDPRO


Bigger and more established yards also embrace additive manufacturing. Shipbuilder Damen, a conglomerate encompassing some 18 shipyards around the world, is working with Dutch company CEAD to build workboats and military patrol vessels using 3D printing. In co-operation with universities and research institutions, a new material is developed, named HDPRO by the developers. It is a version of the very strong and durable material HDPE – High Density Poly Ethylene – that can be printed. HDPRO, like HDPE, is very impact resistant. The printing of the hulls results in a smooth surface. With current material development and printing technology, CEAD can print boats up to 12 meters in length. CEAD is a 3D printing company that has a wider focus than only boat building, Research and development in its MAC – Maritime Application Centre – is conducted in co-operation with Damen and MARIN – the Dutch maritime research institute.


CFM


Fibreglass additive manufacturing was already introduced by Italian company MOI composites in 2020, with the launch of MAMBO, the first completely 3D printed boat as presented at the Genoa Boat Show. The process is called Continuous Fiber Manufacturing (CFM). In this production method, an uninterrupted fibreglass string is impregnated with thermostatic resin. The result is much like woven fibreglass mats that are being injected with resin in a vacuum infusion process, but in this case no mould is needed. The glass fiber is injected with resin in the nozzle of the 3D printing machine that installs the thread of the infused fiber in exactly the right place on the hull while it is being built up. The resin bonds to the previous string of resin infused glass and a fiber reinforced hull is created.


LESSONS


Additive manufacturing changes production considerably. Construction labour is no longer performed by human workforce, but by robots.


The printer arms, often multi-axis robot arms as used in the automotive industry production, are controlled by software that translates the designed shape of a boat, with hull, structural supports, bases for engines and instruments and furniture, into a movement of the printing nozzle that precisely adds layer upon layer of thermoplastic material to bond to the previous layers. After the first years of additive manufacturing of boats, what lessons are learnt?


Benefits of 3D printing boats include: One-run completeness. When cleverly designed, a whole boat, including spaces for installation, furniture and buoyancy can be printed in one go. All moving parts need to be constructed elsewhere and mounted to the hull, however.


Versatile design: because 3D printers run production one-by- one and no mould is needed, every individual boat can be different from the previous one. This will include design cost for the desired alterations, but inflict no extra production cost.


Production is fast. A complete boat (without equipment installed) can be produced in days, where traditional boat building methods see a production time of months.


Reduced cost. There is no waste material, the material used is all included in the boat. There is considerably less human labour involved in production.


Waste reduction. There is almost no waste material after the printing process.


Recyclability. It is very well possible to resource recycled materials to use in 3D printing. As the material is always thermoplastic resin, the production process can in most cases be reversed to recycle the boats after their lifespan.


Drawbacks: Strength. Thermoplastics, consisting of strings that weld together, do not offer the same strength as metals like steel or aluminium.


Degradation. Thermoplastics can deteriorate quickly when exposed to UV radiation. Finishing is required. This will add human labour after all.


Size limitations. To print bigger structures like boats, very large, expensive and complicated machines are required. This necessitates big investments. The investment may however be compensated by the fact that customised production is much easier, and no moulds need to be made.


Surface treatment. Products from printers are often of a rippled surface.


Motivators for the boat builders mentioned above, have been different. The founders of D3aak wanted to build a boat that is really sustainable and succeeded thanks to additive manufacturing. The fact that no waste material is left after production, makes this construction method more environmentally friendly, even if virgin resins are chosen. Other producers focus more on the possibilities to customise to a very high degree when 3D printing. Another benefit is the replacement of labour from the workshop to the design studio. Additive manufacturing can prove to be a driving technology to maintain the production of hulls for boats and yachts in high wage countries, stopping the tendency to have the rough work done in low wage countries and assemble the boats where the cust


THE REPORT | SEP 2025 | ISSUE 113 | 109


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136