search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
to America. The repaired bow, constructed from European timbers, fits with this timeline and supports the vessel’s later identity as Lord Sandwich.


In addition to the physical materials, researchers noted construction features unique to Endeavour, such as the use of paired and tripled floor timbers positioned precisely where the ship’s main and fore masts would have stood. A particularly rare joint—a scarph connecting the stempost to the forward end of the keel—was also observed on RI 2394, matching details specific to Endeavour’s original build.


In both 1999 and 2019, RIMAP and the ANMM established a set of criteria that would be used to determine the wreck’s identity. These criteria, based on a “preponderance of evidence” approach, combined historical documentation, structural analysis, material identification, and archaeological context. With the publication of this final report, the ANMM has declared that enough of these criteria have now been met to positively identify RI 2394 as the wreck of Lord Sandwich, formerly His Majesty’s Bark Endeavour.


Given the vessel’s historical and cultural importance to Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Indigenous peoples throughout the Pacific, the ANMM emphasises the need for the highest level of legislative and physical protection of the site. The discovery brings closure to a long- standing historical mystery and marks a significant moment in international maritime heritage.


Mosaic showing frame and scuttling hole beneath letter board, north is at bottom of image. Photo credit: (John D. Broadwater).


The identification of RI 2394 not only confirms the final resting place of Endeavour, but also invites broader reflection on the complex legacies of exploration, science, colonisation, and conflict that the ship represents. More than 250 years after it first set sail from England, Endeavour continues to shape conversations about history, identity, and the maritime world. With this confirmation, a tangible piece of that history has been brought back into view.


Read the Executive Summary taken from the report itself...


His Majesty’s Bark (HMB) Endeavour is a significant vessel in Australian maritime history and one that elicits mixed opinions. For some, the Pacific voyage led by James Cook between 1768 and 1771 embodies


128 | ISSUE 113 | SEP 2025 | THE REPORT


the spirit of Europe’s Age of Enlightenment, while for others it symbolises the onset of colonisation and the subjugation of First Nations Peoples. Less well understood in Australia is Endeavour’s afterlife as a British troop transport and prison ship caught up in the American War of Independence. It was in this capacity – and renamed Lord Sandwich – that the vessel was deliberately sunk in Rhode Island in 1778.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136