search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
What Must Happen Now


The situation is urgent but not yet irreversible. Exports are resuming, but large-scale shipments have not yet commenced. There is a narrow window of opportunity to prevent the next casualty. The following actions must be taken immediately:


For P&I Clubs and the International Group


Establish minimum standards for surveyor appointment on iron ore fines shipments, particularly from Indian ports. Cost must not be the determining factor. Competence, experience, and independence must be verified before appointment.


Prohibit correspondents from appointing their own affiliated survey firms for safety-critical operations. The conflict of interest is obvious and unacceptable.


Require independent pre-loading surveys by qualified surveyors for all iron ore fines shipments from stockpiles that have been inactive for more than one year. The survey must include visual inspection of stockpiles, witnessing of sampling, and independent verification of cargo condition.


Establish standard rates across clubs for specific regions and cargo types to prevent a “race to the bottom” where surveyors compete solely on price. Professional services should be compensated at levels that allow proper execution.


Work with the IIMS to maintain and publish lists of qualified surveyors for iron ore fines operations, making these lists available to all claims handlers and correspondents.


Issue clear guidance to members that masters have full authority to refuse cargo if they have reasonable concerns about safety, and that clubs will support masters who exercise proper professional judgment even if this results in commercial disputes.


For Shipowners and Masters


Do not rely solely on shipper-provided certificates. Appoint independent surveyors to witness sampling and verify cargo condition before loading commences.


Exercise the authority provided under SOLAS and the IMSBC Code to refuse cargo that presents a reasonable safety concern, even if certificates appear to be in order. Document concerns clearly and seek support from the P&I Club.


Conduct can tests on cargo from each barge or stockpile before accepting it aboard. If the can test shows free moisture or cargo instability, stop loading immediately and require additional laboratory testing.


Obtain moisture analysis when approximately 75% of cargo is loaded to verify that conditions have not changed during loading operations.


Avoid loading iron ore fines during or immediately after the monsoon season unless absolutely confident that cargo has been properly protected and tested.


Maintain detailed records of all cargo documentation, sampling procedures, test results, and any concerns raised during loading. These records are essential if a dispute or casualty occurs.


For Shippers


Accept that proper sampling and testing are non- negotiable requirements, not obstacles to trade. The cost is minimal and the alternative is unacceptable.


Engage qualified sampling companies with trained personnel and proper equipment to conduct sampling under approved procedures. Do not select samplers based solely on cost.


Protect stockpiles from weather exposure using effective covering systems. Cargo that has been exposed to multiple monsoon seasons cannot be assumed safe for loading without extensive testing.


Provide complete and accurate information about stockpile history, including age, source, previous handling, and exposure to weather.


Cooperate fully with masters and surveyors who raise legitimate concerns about cargo condition. Commercial considerations must not override safety.


Recognize that providing false or misleading cargo certificates is not merely a commercial matter—it is a criminal act that endangers lives.


98 | ISSUE 115 | MAR 2026 | THE REPORT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156