search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
3-4 Organising and Monitoring ISM Internal Audits


This often raises issues related to the independence of internal auditors. As we can see, the DPA has never been considered as an internal auditor, even though many companies have unfortunately adopted this approach. Indeed, according to the Code, the DPA is responsible for monitoring the safety-related aspects of each vessel’s operation, particularly through the ship’s Master. He cannot then audit something ... for which he is responsible himself! The definition of an audit is unequivocal, “systematic and independent control” ... here, in the case of the DPA as internal auditor, there is no independence, quite … the opposite!


Given this requirement for auditor independence, it makes sense to entrust this task to people outside the Company. Or at least somebody outside of the audited sector, as required by the ISM Code itself (Section 12.5). In rare cases, among certain small shipowners of the “one ship/one Company” type, where any new verification is unfortunately systematically considered “inappropriate,” some internal audits, when they exist, have been conducted by the responsible shore-based manager. The results are generally significant: either they note deficiencies that are their own responsibility (sic!), or the “everything is fine, move along, there’s nothing to see here” syndrome prevails. (0 non- compliances, 0 recommendations!) This is firstly senseless and secondly useless!


For the IMO, therefore, based on this concept of independence, so dear to the logic of self-regulation, it is agreed that, within the framework of the SMS operation entrusted to the DPA, it is up to the latter to appoint internal auditors who can evaluate the SMS’s operation sector by sector.


The concept of independence inspired by ISO standards is essential for obtaining a comprehensive analysis of SMS operation and, by definition, allows for objective, uninfluenced results.


So, while the DPA cannot be one of the internal auditors, according to our circular, they are responsible for organising and monitoring internal audits. This monitoring includes verifying the independence and training of the internal auditors involved. Despite possible translation difficulties from English into another language of the circular, all of this is clear enough to prevent DPAs from auditing themselves!


In practice, while organising internal audits is relatively easy, based on the availability of individual staff, the selection and training of auditors is more difficult.


Indeed, to be an auditor, you must: - Have a thorough understanding of the scope of the SMS sector being audited.


- Choose the key people to be audited. - Interview operators chosen, if possible, with a thorough understanding of the operations concerned.


- Be able to detect possible lies or omissions, sometimes the poor results of a certain “culture of adjustment”


- Quickly consult the corresponding objective evidence such as reports, notifications or recordings.


- Be able, if possible, to make an initial proposal for corrective action and discuss it with the person(s) being audited.


- Be able to reject a statement like “yes, we always do that” or “we know that very well!” without objective evidence!


- Be able to interview a senior executive without apprehension.


- Be able to tell the truth, even if the findings show a failure—including at the very highest level—in your own Company!


- Be able to still report a non-compliance even if corrective action is decided upon instantly (a recording oversight, for example!).


In fact, choosing internal auditors is not easy, especially when the Company is small or young. Using a call for volunteers, which is the recommended method, and then carefully explaining the ins and outs of such an approach, the results are far from guaranteed. Various attempts have been made in all companies, and sometimes a hybrid solution has been found. In this solution, external auditors specialised and unrelated to the flag(s) of the Company’s ships can effectively conduct internal audits, including at the management level, provided they commit to strict confidentiality. *3


Furthermore, the organisation of certification audits and the maintenance of this compliance certification are generally also entrusted to the DPA. This responsibility is all the more important since, according to Flag regulations, it is the Company’s responsibility to request Flag audits on time. With any oversight jeopardising the relevant certificates!


We are wondering, in this context, where the mandatory maritime Administration’s help lies!


Principle of the accurate communication link between CEO & ships CEO


DPA PARALLEL WAY SAFETY OF MARTITIMES OPERATIONS NORMAL WAY MASTER & SHIP’S Personnel 78 | ISSUE 115 | MAR 2026 | THE REPORT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156