search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Vol. 71, No.1 Spring 2026


4 Building a plank-on-frame model is an ambition many of us share, and the sawn sections of


this pear wood


resembled miniature timber closely enough to be an incentive. Fortunately, there was also a good subject ready for the experiment, Harold Hahn’s Hannah.


Models of this vessel will be quite familiar to readers of this journal. Perhaps the most remarkable example is the series by the late William Wiseman in which he dedicated over two thousand hours to recreating this model in a thoroughly well-craſt ed and spirited way. T ere have been others in various issues of the Journal as well.


It is a good starting point for a beginner of plank-on-frame work because of the well-drawn plans and the technique carefully described and illustrated in Hahn’s Colonial Schooners. Hahn’s text and photographs provide clear guidance so a beginner will face few ambiguities. Only when getting into the rigging do many questions arise.


T e Hahn plans are at the familiar 1:48 scale, but I reduced them to 1:96, a scale more familiar to me and in better reach of many of my tools. Any reduction in quality of detail would be more due to inexperience than the smaller scale.


It is well known this reconstruction is based on Howard I. Chapelle’s reconstruction of a late eighteenth-century fi shing schooner. (T ere is a long massively-researched article by Randle Biddle on the likely appearance of Hannah in the members’ section of the Nautical Research Guild’s website.) Erik Ronnberg created a very diff erent possible representation of the early American naval schooner, based on research by the late William A. Baker. T at version shows a vessel with fuller lines, a square topsail on the main as well as the fore, stuns’l booms, and bulwarks pierced for sweeps. Because of this, my model has always been an Armed Colonial Schooner, though I did continue to refer to it as Hannah in my notes.


Hahn’s method seems so well known that it would need little further explanation here. It has been criticized for imitating the real construction of ship frames rather than faithfully recreating fl oor timbers, futtocks, top timbers and so on, and because the simplifi ed sections making up the frame blanks wind up wasting much of the wood. For a beginner in plank-on-frame construction, the method still


Figure 3. Sawing jig.


has many valuable lessons. T e distinctions in the results are subtle and may have little impact for most viewers. As for the wasted wood, this may be a concern for some dealing with greatly valued wood. Mine was just rescued from the wood stove. However, all the accumulated wasted wood from my frames prompted a photograph or two.


Many projects begin with ideas that prove impractical when applied. T ere were a few here. I had imagined using a jig to routinely saw the sections of stock for the frame blanks. T e fi rst time trying this resulted in about a third of the sections sawn too short. Although the sawing jig continued to be useful, it required checking measurements before each cut. (Figure 3) I had also imagined sawing the keel slot for all the frame blanks on my Preac saw at once. T at never happened. I had also imagined gluing and clamping all of the pieces of a frame blank all together in my small desk vise. T e pieces had too much of a tendency to driſt so the safest practice was to carefully glue each section together individually, a slower but surer practice. I had also imagined I would be able to make good use of the contrasting colors of my old tree’s wood, and although there was some success, the contrasts were not as striking as I’d hoped.


Because of determination to use only wood from our tree, some opportunities for better contrasts were lost. T ere were eventually only two exceptions; the tree’s wood would not bend well enough to form the mast hoops, so I used pear wood from a piece generously given to me by


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100