search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Nautical Research Journal


well versed in the life of Alberto Santos-Dumont as well as in the actual mechanics of Santo-Dumont’s machines. I am indebted to his kindness in sharing copies of unpublished original pictures of the No. 18 Hydroplane. T is was particularly important when it came time to model the engine on the boat. I also learned a great deal about Santos-Dumont through de Barros’ book: Santos-Dumont E A Invencoo Do Voo even though it is written in Portuguese.


Professor de Barros’ book about Santos-Dumont is the only one I have come across that correctly portrays and talks about the No. 18 machine. Unfortunately, the two well-regarded books written in English, Wings of Madness by Paul Hoff man and Master of the Balloon by Nancy Winters, mistakenly portray the boat as an airplane that could rise from the water. However, the books are still worth reading as they do give insight into Santos-Dumont as a person.


T e books authored by Alberto Santos-Dumont: My Airships (1904) and O Que Eu Vi, O Que Nós Veremos (1908), do not touch on the hydroplane project. Nevertheless, they helped me understand his design process. I now view Santos-Dumont as an exceptional inventor with substantial engineering talent. His designs effi ciently blend simplicity with functionality. It is also clear that he would work in an iterative nature—one project oſt en being a natural extension of a previous project. T is can be seen in design and by noticing that parts of one project were oſt en seen on an ensuing project. For example, the radiators on the No. 18 Hydroplane seem to be the same ones used fi rst on the No. 15 airplane.


During the time that the hydroplane was being


constructed several articles were published that provided a dimensional starting point for a reconstruction. Two articles published in Scientifi c American and one in the Aeronautical Journal indicate that the craſt was 10 meters long, had a width of 6 meters and a propeller diameter of 2.1 meters. We also learn that the ‘apparatus consists of


three cigar-shaped reservoirs fi lled with compressed air’. A 100-horsepower V16 Antoinette engine is the likely power source; however, it also could have been rated at 120 horsepower. Either way, the dimensions of the engine would be similar.


Contemporary photographs of the hydroplane


during and aſt er construction were most helpful in understanding the design aspects. It was additionally useful to know that Alberto Santos-Dumont stood fi ve feet tall. One of the most useful pictures for creating plans for the model shows Santos-Dumont standing next to the uncovered main pontoon. (Figure 3).


Based on the dimensions quoted above and


photographic evidence, I made the conjectures that the main pontoon had maximum diameter of 75 centimeters at the fourth or fi ſt h cross-section hoop; that hoops were made from material 1 centimeter thick and 3 to 4 centimeters wide; the hoops were spaced about two feet apart, that is approximately 0.61 meters apart; and the longitudinal framing was made from material dimensioned approximately 4 to 5 centimeters by 2.5 to 3 centimeters.


I chose to build my model to the scale of 1:16. T e choice was dictated by my desire to use two of the Model Airway 14-bis Antoinette engine kits as a basis for the V16 engine needed for the model. T us, based on published articles and historical photographs I commenced the draſt ing process. Soon a working drawing was developed so that the modeling process could begin. (Figure 4).


Building the Pontoon and Nacelles


Castello boxwood was chosen to be the wood species used in this model. Fabricating the transverse circular hoops would be my fi rst task. T ey would be laminated using three layers of 0.35-millimeter wood. T e thickness sander got a good workout thinning the material. Formers were turned on a lathe to the inside


11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100