This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
special report


Yet it seems that at least some holidaymakers


do feel that they’re seizing the moment when singling out places such as the Great Barrier Reef. A survey published last year suggested that a staggering 69% of the tourists at the reef who were questioned had opted to make their visit “before it’s gone”. The authors of the report, from the University


of Queensland, wrote: “In the long term, the increased tourism might exacerbate the pressure on this already vulnerable region — potentially even hastening the collapse of this ecosystem and the tourism industry that relies on its health. This paradox is deepened further when we consider that many of the tourists in our survey, who said they were visiting the reef to ‘see it before it’s gone’, nevertheless had low levels of concern about their own impact on the region.” On the other hand, what this research threw


up about tourist motives does seem to fly in the face of a lot of anecdotal evidence. For example, Frontier Travel organises trips to the Canadian Arctic to view polar bears. Marketing manager Julie Thompson puts it this way: “It doesn’t seem that our clients are worried that they might not get to see the polar bears if they don’t do it soon enough, rather that it’s a holiday they want to cross off their own list and therefore view it as a so-called ‘bucket-list trip’.”


Footfall concerns, highlighted in the Australian


research, can obviously be a problem — but many of the more popular tourist locations at risk are now carefully controlling numbers and, at the same time, using the income from tourism to further protect the environment. As Naturetrek’s Andy Tucker explains: “There’s


actually been no beter time to visit the Galapagos — at least over the past 25 years — as the Galapagos National Park has been very effective at dealing with the management of visitor sites and the number of boats able to anchor at each site on any given day.” To put things into context, he added: “Any


negative impact caused by the footfall of eco- tourists is dwarfed by the destruction caused by population growth, road building, deforestation, palm oil cultivation, the extraction of oil sands and other fossil fuels, the collection of wild animals for the pet trade, overfishing, etc.” Perhaps the most poignant type of last-chance


tourism is when you don’t know that you’re seeing something that’s about to disappear: such as the Buddhas of Bamiyan or Palmyra. And let’s not forget the joys of first-chance tourism: the privilege of being the first to visit previously closed countries; the indulgent pleasure of staying in a newly-built luxury hotel; or the excitement of visiting a just-opened art gallery.


“WE PREFER TO FOCUS ON MESSAGING THAT PROMOTES THE POSITIVE IMPACT TRAVEL CAN HAVE”


28


ABTA Magazine | August 2017


IMAGE: GETTY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76